The influence of electromagnetic radiation of cell phones on the behavior of animals

2020 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream
MixedLow evidencePaper 1531

In open-field testing, locomotion and vertical motor activity (support stands) were reduced in exposed groups versus control, with larger reductions reported for exposure to a Samsung Galaxy J1 Mini than a Xiaomi Redmi S2. Sniffing rates were reported as high…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2020
Study typeanimal
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

The influence of electromagnetic radiation of cell phones on the behavior of animals Sultangaliyeva I, Beisenova R, Tazitdinova R, Abzhalelov A, Khanturin M. Vet World. The influence of electromagnetic radiation of cell phones on the behavior of animals. 2020 Mar;13(3):549-555. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.549-555. Abstract Background and Aim: The radiation emitted from cell phones has various deleterious effects on human health. The article considers the problem of the effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) of cell phones on the behavior of animals. The use of mobile phones is continually increasing throughout the world. All of the world population uses mobile phones widely; thus, having strong and daily effect on the brain. There is no restriction on the use of mobile phones. Getting more advantages and convenience of mobile communication, the population is trying not to hear the information about possible risks to their health, there is no element of self- restraint. The aim of this work was to study behavioral patterns in response to the influence of cell phones. Materials and Methods: The experiments were carried out on 90 white outbred rats weighing 250-300 g. Experiments were carried out and the effect of EMR from Samsung Galaxy J1 mini and Xiaomi Redmi S2 phones on animal behavior was studied. Behavioral reactions were studied using the open field method. Results: By the quality of the act of locomotion in the second experimental group is reduced by 30% and also in this group by the time of the act is 23% lower than in the control data. Vertical motor activity, a support stand, is also suppressed in the second experimental group: 61% lower in number and 47.2% lower in act time compared to the control group. Based on the data, we can conclude that the EMR of the phone Samsung Galaxy J1 Mini affects the behavior of animals to a greater extent than Xiaomi Redmi S2. By the frequency of the act, sniffing is 26% lower; by the time of the act, it remained at the level of control data in the second group. In the third group of the animals, the number and time of the act are 15% lower than the control data. The support stands as an indicator of research activity. In the second group the act of stand with support - by number was lower by 57% than the control data, this indicates that research activity is being suppressed. Conclusion: According to the above changes under the action of EMR from the Samsung Galaxy J1 Mini and Xiaomi Redmi S2 phones, the motor component of behavior is suppressed. The research component of behavior in all groups of animals is enhanced due to high rates of sniffing. It is possible that in animals under stress, the motivation to interact with the environment decreases, leading to an excessive self-accentuation of the animal. Immobility is seen in all experimental groups, which indicates the suppression of the emotional sphere of brain activity. Defecation and urination change only slightly, which may also indicate the suppression of animal emotions. Open access paper: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal
Effect directionmixed
Population90 white outbred rats (250–300 g)
Sample size90
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 72% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In open-field testing, locomotion and vertical motor activity (support stands) were reduced in exposed groups versus control, with larger reductions reported for exposure to a Samsung Galaxy J1 Mini than a Xiaomi Redmi S2. Sniffing rates were reported as high/relatively enhanced, while immobility was observed in all experimental groups; defecation and urination changed only slightly.

Outcomes measured

  • Animal behavior (open field test)
  • Locomotor activity
  • Vertical motor activity (support stand)
  • Sniffing (exploratory behavior)
  • Immobility
  • Defecation and urination

Limitations

  • Exposure characteristics (e.g., frequency, SAR, distance, duration) not reported in the abstract
  • Group definitions and allocation/randomization not described in the abstract
  • Blinding of behavioral assessment not described in the abstract
  • Statistical testing/significance not reported in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "mobile phone",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "90 white outbred rats (250–300 g)",
  "sample_size": 90,
  "outcomes": [
    "Animal behavior (open field test)",
    "Locomotor activity",
    "Vertical motor activity (support stand)",
    "Sniffing (exploratory behavior)",
    "Immobility",
    "Defecation and urination"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In open-field testing, locomotion and vertical motor activity (support stands) were reduced in exposed groups versus control, with larger reductions reported for exposure to a Samsung Galaxy J1 Mini than a Xiaomi Redmi S2. Sniffing rates were reported as high/relatively enhanced, while immobility was observed in all experimental groups; defecation and urination changed only slightly.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Exposure characteristics (e.g., frequency, SAR, distance, duration) not reported in the abstract",
    "Group definitions and allocation/randomization not described in the abstract",
    "Blinding of behavioral assessment not described in the abstract",
    "Statistical testing/significance not reported in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.72,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "electromagnetic radiation",
    "EMR",
    "mobile phone",
    "cell phone",
    "rats",
    "open field test",
    "behavior",
    "locomotion",
    "exploratory behavior"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "mobile-phones",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Study evaluates behavioral effects of EMR from two mobile phone models in rats."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.549-555
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library