Behavioral changes and gene profile alterations after chronic 1,950-MHz radiofrequency exposure: An observation in C57BL/6 mice

2020 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream

MixedLow evidencePaper 1371

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2020

Study typeanimal

Reported directionMixed

Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Behavioral changes and gene profile alterations after chronic 1,950-MHz radiofrequency exposure: An observation in C57BL/6 mice Ye Ji Jeong, Yeonghoon Son, Hyung-Do Choi, Nam Kim, Yun-Sil Lee, Young-Gyu Ko, Hae-June Lee. Behavioral changes and gene profile alterations after chronic 1,950-MHz radiofrequency exposure: An observation in C57BL/6 mice. Brain Behav. 2020 Aug 28;e01815. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1815. Abstract Introduction: Due to public concerns about deleterious biological consequences of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF), the potential effects of RF-EMF on the central nervous system have received wide consideration. Methods: Here, two groups of C57BL/6 mice, aged 2 and 12 months, were exposed to 1,950-MHz RF-EMF at a specific absorption rate of 5.0 W/kg for chronic periods (2 hr/day and 5 days/week for 8 months). Behavioral changes were then assessed in the mice at 10 months (sham- or RF-10M) and 20 months (sham- or RF-20M), on the open-field test, the Y-maze test, and an object recognition memory task, while biological effects were analyzed via microarray gene profiling of the hippocampus. Results: Open-field test results showed a decrease in the time duration spent at the center while there was a decrease in enhanced memory shown by the Y-maze test and the novel object recognition test in the RF-20M mice, compared to sham-exposed mice, but no significant changes in the RF-10M group. Based on a 2-fold change cutoff, the microarray data revealed that 15 genes, which are listed as being involved in neurogenesis on Gene Ontology, were altered in both groups. Quantitative real-time PCR for validation showed increased expression of Epha8 and Wnt6 in the hippocampi of RF-20M group mice, although 13 additional genes showed no significant changes following RF-EMF exposure. Conclusion: Therefore, cognitive enhancement following chronic exposure for 8 months to RF-EMF from middle age may be associated with increases in neurogenesis-related signals in the hippocampus of C57BL/6 mice. Open access paper: onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal

Effect directionmixed

PopulationC57BL/6 mice (aged 2 and 12 months at start; assessed at 10 and 20 months)

Sample sizeNot supplied

ExposureRF · 1950 MHz · 5 W/kg · 2 hr/day, 5 days/week for 8 months

Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In 20-month-old mice (RF-20M), open-field testing showed decreased time spent in the center and memory performance was decreased on the Y-maze and novel object recognition tests versus sham; no significant behavioral changes were reported in the 10-month-old group (RF-10M). Microarray analysis (2-fold cutoff) identified 15 neurogenesis-related genes altered in both groups; qRT-PCR validation showed increased Epha8 and Wnt6 expression in RF-20M hippocampi, while 13 other genes were not significantly changed.

Outcomes measured

Behavior (open-field test)
Memory/cognition (Y-maze test)
Object recognition memory
Hippocampal gene expression (microarray)
Hippocampal gene expression validation (qRT-PCR; Epha8, Wnt6 and others)

Limitations

Sample size not reported in the abstract
Exposure source/setup not specified in the abstract
Behavioral results differed by age group (effects present in RF-20M but not RF-10M)
Most microarray-identified genes were not confirmed as significantly changed by qRT-PCR (13/15 not significant)

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": 1950,
    "sar_wkg": 5,
    "duration": "2 hr/day, 5 days/week for 8 months"
  },
  "population": "C57BL/6 mice (aged 2 and 12 months at start; assessed at 10 and 20 months)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Behavior (open-field test)",
    "Memory/cognition (Y-maze test)",
    "Object recognition memory",
    "Hippocampal gene expression (microarray)",
    "Hippocampal gene expression validation (qRT-PCR; Epha8, Wnt6 and others)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In 20-month-old mice (RF-20M), open-field testing showed decreased time spent in the center and memory performance was decreased on the Y-maze and novel object recognition tests versus sham; no significant behavioral changes were reported in the 10-month-old group (RF-10M). Microarray analysis (2-fold cutoff) identified 15 neurogenesis-related genes altered in both groups; qRT-PCR validation showed increased Epha8 and Wnt6 expression in RF-20M hippocampi, while 13 other genes were not significantly changed.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Sample size not reported in the abstract",
    "Exposure source/setup not specified in the abstract",
    "Behavioral results differed by age group (effects present in RF-20M but not RF-10M)",
    "Most microarray-identified genes were not confirmed as significantly changed by qRT-PCR (13/15 not significant)"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency",
    "RF-EMF",
    "1950 MHz",
    "specific absorption rate",
    "SAR 5.0 W/kg",
    "chronic exposure",
    "C57BL/6 mice",
    "open-field test",
    "Y-maze",
    "novel object recognition",
    "hippocampus",
    "microarray",
    "gene profiling",
    "neurogenesis",
    "Epha8",
    "Wnt6"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1815
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library