Swimming direction of the glass catfish is responsive to magnetic stimulation
← Research streamUsing animal tracking software and AI-based quantification in a radial arm maze, glass catfish consistently swam away from static magnetic fields over 20 μT and showed adaptability when magnetic field direction and location were changed.
Study snapshot
Abstract
Swimming direction of the glass catfish is responsive to magnetic stimulation Ryan D Hunt, Ryan C Ashbaugh, Mark Reimers, Lalita Udpa, Gabriela Saldana De Jimenez, Michael Moore, Assaf A Gilad, Galit Pelled. Swimming direction of the glass catfish is responsive to magnetic stimulation. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):e0248141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248141. Abstract Several marine species have developed a magnetic perception that is essential for navigation and detection of prey and predators. One of these species is the transparent glass catfish that contains an ampullary organ dedicated to sense magnetic fields. Here we examine the behavior of the glass catfish in response to static magnetic fields which will provide valuable insight on function of this magnetic response. By utilizing state of the art animal tracking software and artificial intelligence approaches, we quantified the effects of magnetic fields on the swimming direction of glass catfish. The results demonstrate that glass catfish placed in a radial arm maze, consistently swim away from magnetic fields over 20 μT and show adaptability to changing magnetic field direction and location. Open access paper: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Using animal tracking software and AI-based quantification in a radial arm maze, glass catfish consistently swam away from static magnetic fields over 20 μT and showed adaptability when magnetic field direction and location were changed.
Outcomes measured
- swimming direction
- behavioral response to magnetic stimulation
- avoidance behavior
- adaptability to changing magnetic field direction/location
Limitations
- Sample size not stated in abstract
- Exposure characterization limited to a threshold (>20 μT); other exposure parameters not described in abstract
- Duration/timing of exposure not described in abstract
- Outcome measures and statistical details not provided in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": "static magnetic fields",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "glass catfish",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"swimming direction",
"behavioral response to magnetic stimulation",
"avoidance behavior",
"adaptability to changing magnetic field direction/location"
],
"main_findings": "Using animal tracking software and AI-based quantification in a radial arm maze, glass catfish consistently swam away from static magnetic fields over 20 μT and showed adaptability when magnetic field direction and location were changed.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not stated in abstract",
"Exposure characterization limited to a threshold (>20 μT); other exposure parameters not described in abstract",
"Duration/timing of exposure not described in abstract",
"Outcome measures and statistical details not provided in abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"glass catfish",
"magnetoreception",
"static magnetic field",
"magnetic stimulation",
"behavior",
"swimming direction",
"radial arm maze",
"animal tracking",
"artificial intelligence"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "animal-studies",
"weight": 0.9,
"reason": "Behavioral response of an animal species (glass catfish) to static magnetic fields."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248141
PubMed: 33667278
Related papers
- Wireless control of cellular function by activation of a novel protein responsive to electromagnetic fields. 2018
- Behavioral evidence for geomagnetic imprinting and transgenerational inheritance in fruit flies 2019
- Transduction of the Geomagnetic Field as Evidenced from Alpha-band Activity in the Human Brain 2019
- Low magnetic fields stimulate cardiac mitochondrial bioenergetics with a bell-shaped response: Possibly via a radical pair mechanism 2025
- Static magnetic field on behavior, hematological parameters and organ damage in spontaneously hypertensive rats 2020
- Biophysical mechanism of animal magnetoreception, orientation and navigation 2024