Cellular stress response to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF): An explanation for controversial effects of ELF-EMF on apoptosis (Review)
← Research streamThis review summarizes studies on non-ionizing, non-thermal extremely low-frequency electromagnetic/magnetic fields (ELF-EMF/ELF-MF) and apoptosis. It reports that ELF-EMF exposure alone generally shows very low or no statistically significant changes in apop…
Study snapshot
Abstract
Cellular stress response to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF): An explanation for controversial effects of ELF-EMF on apoptosis (Review) Barati M, Darvishi B, Javidi MA, Mohammadian A, Shariatpanahi SP, Eisavand MR, Madjid Ansari A. Cellular stress response to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF): An explanation for controversial effects of ELF-EMF on apoptosis. Cell Prolif. 2021 Nov 6:e13154. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13154. Abstract Impaired apoptosis is one of the hallmarks of cancer, and almost all of the non-surgical approaches of eradicating tumour cells somehow promote induction of apoptosis. Indeed, numerous studies have stated that non-ionizing non-thermal extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) can modulate the induction of apoptosis in exposed cells; however, much controversy exists in observations. When cells are exposed to ELF- EMF alone, very low or no statistically significant changes in apoptosis are observed. Contrarily, exposure to ELF- EMF in the presence of a co-stressor, including a chemotherapeutic agent or ionizing radiation, can either potentiate or inhibit apoptotic effects of the co-stressor. In our idea, the main point neglected in interpreting these discrepancies is "the cellular stress responses" of cells following ELF-EMF exposure and its interplay with apoptosis. The main purpose of the current review was to outline the triangle of ELF-EMF, the cellular stress response of cells and apoptosis and to interpret and unify discrepancies in results based on it. Therefore, initially, we will describe studies performed on identifying the effect of ELF-EMF on induction/inhibition of apoptosis and enumerate proposed pathways through which ELF-EMF exposure may affect apoptosis; then, we will explain cellular stress response and cues for its induction in response to ELF-EMF exposure; and finally, we will explain why such controversies have been observed by different investigators. Open access paper: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
This review summarizes studies on non-ionizing, non-thermal extremely low-frequency electromagnetic/magnetic fields (ELF-EMF/ELF-MF) and apoptosis. It reports that ELF-EMF exposure alone generally shows very low or no statistically significant changes in apoptosis, while ELF-EMF combined with co-stressors (e.g., chemotherapeutic agents or ionizing radiation) may either potentiate or inhibit the co-stressor’s apoptotic effects; the authors propose cellular stress responses as a framework to interpret these discrepancies.
Outcomes measured
- Apoptosis modulation (induction/inhibition)
- Cellular stress response
Limitations
- Narrative review; methods for study identification/selection are not described in the abstract
- No specific exposure parameters (frequency, intensity, duration) are provided in the abstract
- No quantitative synthesis or effect size estimates are reported in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "review",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": null,
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Apoptosis modulation (induction/inhibition)",
"Cellular stress response"
],
"main_findings": "This review summarizes studies on non-ionizing, non-thermal extremely low-frequency electromagnetic/magnetic fields (ELF-EMF/ELF-MF) and apoptosis. It reports that ELF-EMF exposure alone generally shows very low or no statistically significant changes in apoptosis, while ELF-EMF combined with co-stressors (e.g., chemotherapeutic agents or ionizing radiation) may either potentiate or inhibit the co-stressor’s apoptotic effects; the authors propose cellular stress responses as a framework to interpret these discrepancies.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Narrative review; methods for study identification/selection are not described in the abstract",
"No specific exposure parameters (frequency, intensity, duration) are provided in the abstract",
"No quantitative synthesis or effect size estimates are reported in the abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "insufficient",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"ELF-EMF",
"ELF-MF",
"extremely low-frequency",
"non-ionizing",
"non-thermal",
"apoptosis",
"cellular stress response",
"co-stressor",
"chemotherapeutic agent",
"ionizing radiation",
"cancer"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0.2,
"reason": "Discusses ELF-EMF/ELF-MF exposure broadly; specific setting not stated."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1111/cpr.13154
PubMed: Not supplied
Related papers
- Effect of Short-time Exposure of Local Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields on Sleepiness in Male Rats 2022
- The effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic field exposure on apoptosis, neurodegeneration and trace element levels in the rat brain 2023
- Exposure To Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields In Low- And Middle-Income Countries: An Overview 2020
- Measurement and analysis of power-frequency magnetic fields in residences: Results from a pilot study 2018
- Measurement and analysis of power-frequency magnetic fields in residences: Results from a pilot study 2018
- Cellular Response to ELF-MF and Heat: Evidence for a Common Involvement of Heat Shock Proteins? 2017