[Exposure of the scrotum to 4G cellphone radiofrequency radiation affects spermatogenesis and blood-testis barrier of adult male rats]

Zhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology · 2021 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream
HarmLow evidencePaper 957

Compared with controls, rats exposed to 4G cellphone RF-EMR to the scrotum had lower sperm concentration, viability, motility, and morphologically normal sperm percentage, and lower Johnsen's score, with higher Coentino's score. Exposure was associated with i…

Study snapshot

PublicationZhonghua nan ke xue = National journal of andrology · 2021
Study typeanimal
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

[Exposure of the scrotum to 4G cellphone radiofrequency radiation affects spermatogenesis and blood-testis barrier of adult male rats] Qing Cheng, Gang Yu, Gang Wang, Zhi-Ming Bai. [Exposure of the scrotum to 4G cellphone radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation affects the spermatogenesis and blood-testis barrier of adult male rats] [Article in Chinese]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2021 Aug;27(8):680-684. Abstract Objective: To investigate the direct impact of exposure of the scrotum to 4G cellphone radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) on the testis of adult rats. Methods: We equally randomized 30 adult male SD rats into a control and an exposure group, the latter exposed to 4G cellphone RF-EMR 6 hours a day for 150 days. Then, we analyzed the changes in semen quality and seminiferous epithelia, and measured the levels antioxidant enzyme-peroxide and the expressions of blood- testis barrier proteins in the testis of the rats. Results: Compared with the controls, the rats in the exposure group showed significantly decreased sperm concentration ([6.39 ± 0.82] vs [4.74 ± 0.87] ×107/ml, P < 0.05), viability (62.11 ± 8.82]% vs [41.44 ± 7.33]%, P < 0.05), motility ([55.71 ± 7.39] vs [36.22 ± 6.36]%, P < 0.05), the percentage of morphologically normal sperm ([84.89 ± 5.11]% vs [70.78 ± 8.11]%, P < 0.05) and Johnsen's score (8.38 ± 0.98 vs 6.11 ± 1.56, P < 0.05), increased Coentino's score (1.36 ± 0.21 vs 1.81 ± 0.34, P < 0.05) and MDA level (P < 0.05), reduced levels of SOD, GSH and CAT (P < 0.05), and down-regulated expressions of occludin, ZO-1, CAR and N-Cadherin (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Exposure of the scrotum to 4G cellphone RF-EMR directly causes injury of the testis, disorder of the blood-testis barrier, reduction of semen quality and consequently decline in the fertility of male rats. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal
Effect directionharm
PopulationAdult male SD rats
Sample size30
ExposureRF · 6 hours/day for 150 days
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Compared with controls, rats exposed to 4G cellphone RF-EMR to the scrotum had lower sperm concentration, viability, motility, and morphologically normal sperm percentage, and lower Johnsen's score, with higher Coentino's score. Exposure was associated with increased MDA, reduced SOD/GSH/CAT, and down-regulated occludin, ZO-1, CAR, and N-Cadherin expression in testis.

Outcomes measured

  • Sperm concentration
  • Sperm viability
  • Sperm motility
  • Percentage of morphologically normal sperm
  • Johnsen's score (seminiferous epithelium)
  • Coentino's score
  • MDA level
  • SOD level
  • GSH level
  • CAT level
  • Testicular expression of blood-testis barrier proteins (occludin, ZO-1, CAR, N-Cadherin)

Limitations

  • Frequency and SAR/dosimetry not reported in the abstract
  • Animal model; generalizability to humans is uncertain
  • Blinding and detailed randomization procedures not described in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "mobile phone",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "6 hours/day for 150 days"
  },
  "population": "Adult male SD rats",
  "sample_size": 30,
  "outcomes": [
    "Sperm concentration",
    "Sperm viability",
    "Sperm motility",
    "Percentage of morphologically normal sperm",
    "Johnsen's score (seminiferous epithelium)",
    "Coentino's score",
    "MDA level",
    "SOD level",
    "GSH level",
    "CAT level",
    "Testicular expression of blood-testis barrier proteins (occludin, ZO-1, CAR, N-Cadherin)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Compared with controls, rats exposed to 4G cellphone RF-EMR to the scrotum had lower sperm concentration, viability, motility, and morphologically normal sperm percentage, and lower Johnsen's score, with higher Coentino's score. Exposure was associated with increased MDA, reduced SOD/GSH/CAT, and down-regulated occludin, ZO-1, CAR, and N-Cadherin expression in testis.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "Frequency and SAR/dosimetry not reported in the abstract",
    "Animal model; generalizability to humans is uncertain",
    "Blinding and detailed randomization procedures not described in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "4G",
    "cellphone",
    "RF-EMR",
    "radiofrequency radiation",
    "scrotum exposure",
    "testis",
    "spermatogenesis",
    "semen quality",
    "blood-testis barrier",
    "oxidative stress",
    "rats"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "mobile-phones",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Exposure described as 4G cellphone RF-EMR."
    },
    {
      "slug": "male-fertility",
      "weight": 0.85,
      "reason": "Outcomes include semen quality and spermatogenesis-related measures."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 34914238

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library