Evaluation of Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields from Smart Utility Meters operating at

Bioelectromagnetics · 2023 · No effect · Low evidence

← Research stream
No effectLow evidencePaper 537

Under laboratory-controlled conditions, the maximum 6-min averaged power density measured around smart utility meters operating at 868 MHz was 0.1 mWm-2, reported as <0.0024% of the corresponding 1998 ICNIRP general public reference level. Measured duty facto…

Study snapshot

PublicationBioelectromagnetics · 2023
Study typeexposure_assessment
Reported directionNo effect
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Evaluation of Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields from Smart Utility Meters operating at 868 MHz Addison D, Calderon C, Peyman A. Evaluation of Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields from Smart Utility Meters operating at 868 MHz. Bioelectromagnetics. 2023 Mar 31. doi: 10.1002/bem.22440. Abstract Power density and duty factor values were measured around smart utility meters operating at 868 MHz under laboratory-controlled conditions. The maximum 6-min averaged exposure recorded was 0.1 mWm-2 , which is less than 0.0024% of the corresponding 1998 ICNIRP general public reference level. Duty factors measured were less than 2.8%. This study found that the exposure contribution from Zigbee smart meter devices operating at 868 MHz is generally lower than, if not similar to, those operating at 2.4 GHz. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeexposure_assessment
Effect directionno_effect
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF · 868 MHz · 6-min averaged exposure
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Under laboratory-controlled conditions, the maximum 6-min averaged power density measured around smart utility meters operating at 868 MHz was 0.1 mWm-2, reported as <0.0024% of the corresponding 1998 ICNIRP general public reference level. Measured duty factors were <2.8%. The study reports that exposure contribution from Zigbee smart meter devices at 868 MHz is generally lower than, if not similar to, those operating at 2.4 GHz.

Outcomes measured

  • Power density
  • Duty factor
  • 6-min averaged exposure (power density) relative to ICNIRP 1998 general public reference level
  • Comparison of exposure contribution vs Zigbee devices operating at 2.4 GHz

Limitations

  • Measurements were conducted under laboratory-controlled conditions (may not reflect real-world use/exposure).
  • No population/health outcomes were assessed; exposure metrics only.
  • Sample size and measurement protocol details are not provided in the abstract.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "smart meter",
    "frequency_mhz": 868,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "6-min averaged exposure"
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Power density",
    "Duty factor",
    "6-min averaged exposure (power density) relative to ICNIRP 1998 general public reference level",
    "Comparison of exposure contribution vs Zigbee devices operating at 2.4 GHz"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Under laboratory-controlled conditions, the maximum 6-min averaged power density measured around smart utility meters operating at 868 MHz was 0.1 mWm-2, reported as <0.0024% of the corresponding 1998 ICNIRP general public reference level. Measured duty factors were <2.8%. The study reports that exposure contribution from Zigbee smart meter devices at 868 MHz is generally lower than, if not similar to, those operating at 2.4 GHz.",
  "effect_direction": "no_effect",
  "limitations": [
    "Measurements were conducted under laboratory-controlled conditions (may not reflect real-world use/exposure).",
    "No population/health outcomes were assessed; exposure metrics only.",
    "Sample size and measurement protocol details are not provided in the abstract."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "smart utility meters",
    "smart meters",
    "Zigbee",
    "868 MHz",
    "2.4 GHz",
    "radiofrequency",
    "RF-EMF",
    "power density",
    "duty factor",
    "ICNIRP 1998",
    "general public reference level",
    "laboratory-controlled measurements"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "smart-meters",
      "weight": 0.95,
      "reason": "Directly evaluates RF exposure from smart utility meters (Zigbee) at 868 MHz."
    },
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.6,
      "reason": "Compares measured exposure to ICNIRP 1998 general public reference level."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1002/bem.22440
PubMed: 37002551

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library