The commenter asks HHS to prioritize non-ionizing medical-imaging alternatives and assess cumulative expo…

HHS public comment #6005 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-28

#1The commenter asks HHS to prioritize non-ionizing medical-imaging alternatives and assess cumulative expo…by Dawn Loughborough » 2026-10-28
AI summary & topic connections

The commenter asks HHS to prioritize non-ionizing medical-imaging alternatives and assess cumulative exposures, noting a personal choice of quantitative transmission imaging instead of mammography and referring to an attached detailed submission.

  • Research & federal duties: I urge HHS to prioritize safer, non-ionizing alternatives and rigorously evaluate cumulative exposures.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

I am submitting this comment as a concerned individual (age over 18) regarding potential health effects of RF/EMF exposures and ionizing radiation from medical imaging. My full detailed comments, including personal experience choosing Quantitative Transmission (QT) Imaging in lieu of mammography, supporting evidence, and recommendations, are contained in the attached PDF. I urge HHS to prioritize safer, non-ionizing alternatives and rigorously evaluate cumulative exposures.

Attachments · 1

Preview: HHS_EMF_Public_Comment

If the preview is blank, open the PDF in a new tab.

Original public attachments as filed. Their contents are not included in the topic review.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies