Questions the scientific value of public anecdotes and criticizes the inquiry’s approach.

HHS public comment #2364 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-13

#1Questions the scientific value of public anecdotes and criticizes the inquiry’s approach.by Anonymous Anonymous » 2026-10-13
AI summary & topic connections

Questions the scientific value of public anecdotes and criticizes the inquiry’s approach.

  • Research & federal duties: because ordinary people do not conduct scientific studies. Anecdotal evidence is not scientific and can simply be the

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

You cannot ask the public for "scientific" information because ordinary people do not conduct scientific studies. Anecdotal evidence is not scientific and can simply be the result of chance rather than a distinct causal relationship. You are a fucking disgrace to science and are setting our society back decades with bullshit anti science rhetoric like this.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies