Criticizes the inquiry and argues that scientific evidence supports the safety of non-ionizing exposure.

HHS public comment #2148 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-09

#1Criticizes the inquiry and argues that scientific evidence supports the safety of non-ionizing exposure.by John Smillie » 2026-10-09
AI summary & topic connections

Criticizes the inquiry and argues that scientific evidence supports the safety of non-ionizing exposure.

  • Research & federal duties: ense? What could this possibly achieve? The scientific evidence has been looked at. It's fine, as one would expect fro

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

This is so stupid. Why are you seeking public input on conspiracy theory nonsense? What could this possibly achieve?

The scientific evidence has been looked at. It's fine, as one would expect from non-ionizing radiation! We are bombarded by non-ionizing radiation from the sun every day at mich higher intensities and frequencies! It's called visible light!

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-021-00297-6

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies