Skip to content

See attached file(s)

HHS public comment #5300 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-27

Official submission ↗ReplySearch the forum

#1See attached file(s)by Name not supplied » 2026-10-27

Awaiting category review

Original comment · unedited text

See attached file(s)

Attachments · 9

Preview: Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions

If the preview is blank, open the PDF in a new tab.

Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions 2.9 MB · Download · Official ↗
ICBE-EMF Child Health Cell Phone Cell Tower EMF Position Statement 0.5 MB · Download · Official ↗
ELECTROMAGNETIC-HYPERSENSITIVITY-EHS-IS-A-HUMANITARIAN-CRISIS-THAT-REQUIRES-AN-URGENT-RESPONSE-1 0.1 MB · Download · Official ↗
Exposure limits to radiofrequency EMF do not account for cancer risk or reproductive toxicity assessed from data in experimental animals 1.1 MB · Download · Official ↗
Conflicting views in experimental carcinogenesis a commentary on design and methodological deficiencies in the follow-up validation studies on radiofrequency radiation 0.7 MB · Download · Official ↗
ICBE-EMFScientifc evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation- implications for 5G 2.5 MB · Download · Official ↗
The systematic review on RF-EMF exposure and cancer by Karipidis et al. contains methodological flaws that impact the reliability of its findings. 0.4 MB · Download · Official ↗
ICBE-EMF Response and Recommendations to HHS 0.4 MB · Download · Official ↗
The WHO-commissioned systematic reviews on health effects of radiofrequency radiation provide no assurance of safety 1.4 MB · Download · Official ↗

Original public attachments as filed. Their contents are not included in the topic review.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies