AI summary & topic connections
Argues for precautionary action on cumulative wireless effects without waiting for demonstrable harm, comparing the issue with tobacco exposure.
- Exposure limits & oversight:
ss tech is not imaginary and "harm", per se, should not be the standard for concern and action. If zero cigarettes is the standard for health and "harm" doesn'
- Other concerns:
-toxic field-effect phenomena? The legacy of cumulative harm from this era of reckless disregard will have your names on it.
Original comment · unedited text
Adverse effects and harm from EMF/wireless tech is not imaginary and "harm", per se, should not be the standard for concern and action. If zero cigarettes is the standard for health and "harm" doesn't result from smoking one or two, then why the double standard on clearly bio-toxic field-effect phenomena? The legacy of cumulative harm from this era of reckless disregard will have your names on it.