The commenter opposes legislation based on perceived electromagnetic effects, questions objections to dat…

HHS public comment #4200 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-24

#1The commenter opposes legislation based on perceived electromagnetic effects, questions objections to dat…by Anonymous Anonymous » 2026-10-24
AI summary & topic connections

The commenter opposes legislation based on perceived electromagnetic effects, questions objections to data centers, and argues that centers should provide or pay for their electricity.

  • Exposure limits & oversight: say no to something that is coming anyway. I do not support legislation on perceived electromagnetism.
  • Power lines, wiring & solar: ric electricity (which is true… They need to provide or pay for their own power) - NOW THIS, electromagnetism. We are looking for reasons to say

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

I think there is two psychosocial illnesses recognized.

Data centers are on the hook for

- using too much water (which is basically untrue)

- using too much electric electricity (which is true… They need to provide or pay for their own power)

- NOW THIS, electromagnetism. We are looking for reasons to say no to something that is coming anyway.

I do not support legislation on perceived electromagnetism.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies