The commenter argues that non-ionizing radiation does not adversely affect health apart from screen-time …

HHS public comment #3884 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-21

#1The commenter argues that non-ionizing radiation does not adversely affect health apart from screen-time …by Anonymous Anonymous » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections

The commenter argues that non-ionizing radiation does not adversely affect health apart from screen-time effects and urges reliance on medical sources while criticizing HHS leadership.

  • Research & federal duties: ime. Also, let's take our information from actual medical sources instead of a man who legitimately claimed he had a brain worm an
  • Other concerns: This radiation is non-ionizing and doesn't affect health negatively other than the implications of usual screen time. Also, let's

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

This radiation is non-ionizing and doesn't affect health negatively other than the implications of usual screen time.

Also, let's take our information from actual medical sources instead of a man who legitimately claimed he had a brain worm and is obviously trying to push his "alternative science" agenda. RFJ Jr is an absolute joke and a scourge that is adversely affecting actual physicians and scientists.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies