AI summary & topic connections
The commenter criticizes FCC reliance on heating-based measurements and alleged industry influence, requesting reassessment using newer research on biological effects.
- Exposure limits & oversight:
Please reevaluate the safety standards
- Proposed biological mechanisms:
all biological life at the cellular level
- Research & federal duties:
20+ years of new studies/evidence
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.
I am responding from the perspective of a parent, family member, caregiver, advocate, and concerned member of the public.
I have been following the multitude of studies that are available since 2010 on the harmful effects of EMF on all biological life at the cellular level at levels FAR lower than SARS (the current heating effect measurements used). I am appalled at how the FCC has acted like a captured agency to the wireless industries it is trying to regulate. Please reevaluate the safety standards based on the, now, 20+ years of new studies/evidence!!