The commenter questions ICNIRP magnetic-field guidelines, contrasts them with lower exposure concerns and…

HHS public comment #5244 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-27

#1The commenter questions ICNIRP magnetic-field guidelines, contrasts them with lower exposure concerns and…by Mehul Bastawala » 2026-10-27
AI summary & topic connections

The commenter questions ICNIRP magnetic-field guidelines, contrasts them with lower exposure concerns and challenges guideline authors to experience elevated fields.

  • Exposure limits & oversight: d files. Do not see icinrp europe nonprofit guidelines of 1k milligauss, as higher than even 2 milliguass concern. The same people who l
  • Power lines, wiring & solar: isted that doc ask them to be in a room with 40+ milligauss! Will they agree.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

See attached files.

Do not see icinrp europe nonprofit guidelines of 1k milligauss, as higher than even 2 milliguass concern. The same people who listed that doc ask them to be in a room with 40+ milligauss! Will they agree.

Attachments · 2

Preview: Emf

If the preview is blank, open the PDF in a new tab.

Original public attachments as filed. Their contents are not included in the topic review.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies