AI summary & topic connections
A retired electrical engineer objects to increasing pulsed RF exposure and federal communications policy, particularly legislation described as removing local infrastructure authority.
- Exposure limits & oversight:
ssion, in general and, more specifically, to HR 2289, before the 119th Congress, which would Eliminate Local Authorit
- Towers & siting:
2289, before the 119th Congress, which would Eliminate Local Authority Over the Communications Infrastructure. To this filing, I plan to attach two documents. The first is
As a retired Electrical Engineer, possessing a GROL (Commercial License), issued by the FCC, who has operated three nuclear reactors, and acquired a background in Radiological Controls and Health Physics, in the process of qualifying as a Nuclear Reactor Operator, I could comment, endlessly, on the scientific reasons for my objections to the ever-increasing levels and distribution of Pulsed-Mode Radio Frequency Electro-Magnetic Radiation, as well as give testimony to the negative health effects I have personally experienced from exposure to same, but I would like to focus my comments on my opposition to the Federal Communications Commission, in general and, more specifically, to HR 2289, before the 119th Congress, which would Eliminate Local Authority Over the Communications Infrastructure.
To this filing, I plan to attach two documents.
The first is a .doc file, in which I express my full comments to the Department of Health and Human Services, concerning Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure, as it pertains to the Federal Communications Commission and to our Founding Documents.
The second is a .pdf document, generated by the National Call for Safe Technology, addressing HR 2289, which is being considered by the 119th Congress.
Thank you.
Dan Medbury