AI summary & topic connections
Links chronic-disease trends to EMF, requests research transparency and additional investigation, and advocates mitigation without waiting for consensus.
- Research & federal duties:
xposure to non-native EMF radiation are well-researched and known, yet no action has been taken to implement
- Exposure limits & oversight:
of prevention and mitigation strategies and guardrails on the industries involved.
- Environmental effects:
ents to human health (as well as that of all biological life). We need transparency and action regarding already-es
The consequences of ubiquitous exposure to non-native EMF radiation are well-researched and known, yet no action has been taken to implement strategies to mitigate, despite what’s known and what’s suspected. The “big-picture” perspective of health and chronic disease over the past 6 decades shows a worsening trend,…not an improvement trend, despite the research/funding/clinical applications dedicated toward individually named chronic health conditions.
The HHS, and all regulatory agencies in the public health sphere of influence would do well to acknowledge and attend to the mounting threat that EMF radiation presents to human health (as well as that of all biological life).
We need transparency and action regarding already-established research on this topic, as well as initiatives to take more seriously continued and novel research; while not waiting for “consensus”…action in the form of prevention and mitigation strategies and guardrails on the industries involved.
Attachments · 2
