A self-described chemical engineer and EMR specialist challenges heating-based safety assurances and cite…

HHS public comment #0913 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-09-25

#1A self-described chemical engineer and EMR specialist challenges heating-based safety assurances and cite…by Anthony Cotton » 2026-09-25
AI summary & topic connections

A self-described chemical engineer and EMR specialist challenges heating-based safety assurances and cites the BioInitiative Report as support for biological effects. The linked material has not been reviewed.

  • Exposure limits & oversight: rst. Premised on the assertion that only EMR energy levels high enough to cause tissue heating would be of concern is absurd and flies in the face of voluminous evidence to the contrary. Biologi
  • Research & federal duties: nt of reference for evidence of EMR's biological effects, I would point to the "BioIniiative Report" at the following link; https://bioinitiative.org/ Conclusion ---------- The Truth regarding EMR

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

Introduction

-------------

My name is Anthony Cotton and I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure (EMR).

Background

----------

My comments are supported by my background as a Chemical Engineer with training and experience in a number of relevant areas; Energy - (oil & gas, electrical, Solar), IT - web development consulting for numerous Fortune 100 companies (banks, pharma, tech, research as well as Federal Agencies). My more recent focus has been a broad study of Human Health - specific to this topic, my certification as an EMRS (Electromagnetic Radiation Specialist) from the Building Biology Institute.

Analysis

-------

The dramatic escalation in the pervasiveness and intensity of people's unseen EMF environment (both public and private) is both unprecedented and unwise. Regulatory agency assurances of "safety" are deceptive at best and malevolent at worst. Premised on the assertion that only EMR energy levels high enough to cause tissue heating would be of concern is absurd and flies in the face of voluminous evidence to the contrary. Biological impacts from very subtle energetic environments are well documented... EMR effects are not dose dependent.

As one single point of reference for evidence of EMR's biological effects, I would point to the "BioIniiative Report" at the following link;

https://bioinitiative.org/

Conclusion

----------

The Truth regarding EMR human health effects can only be pursued if the government is Truly "Of the people, by the people and for the people".

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies