Dear HHS, I am writing to participate in the collection of information regarding the biological effects o…

HHS public comment #6953 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-28

#1Dear HHS, I am writing to participate in the collection of information regarding the biological effects o…by Anonymous Anonymous » 2026-10-28
Original comment · unedited text

Dear HHS,

I am writing to participate in the collection of information regarding the biological effects of Electromagnetic fields (EMF’s) and Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) emitted from all wireless/cellular devices and infrastructure. I am writing under your question: Public Experiences and Reported Potential Adverse Health Effects.

I have been biologically impacted from EMF/RFR for many years. I have a medical diagnosis from my physician and have attached a redacted version of the letter that she provided to the U.S District Court Court stating this diagnosis, and that I would not be able to participate in Jury Duty, due to the biological impacts of the EMF/RFR present in the court's environment-the request for dismissal was granted.

I want to begin by saying that millions of people around the world are biologically affected by EMF/RFR and these numbers are steadily growing as a result of our everyday exposures. In my own life, I have had to make significant changes in order to stay healthy in our modern wireless world. When exposed to EMF/RFR via wireless/cellular devices and infrastructure, I experience biological flu-like symptoms, ear pain and heart palpitations which quickly resolve once I am away from these exposures. While these are the biological effects I observe in the immediacy, I also note that EMF/RFR has been demonstrated to cause inflammation and Oxidative Stress which play out in the body over time.

Protective steps in daily life:

-No wireless devices-everything is hard wired

-Landline- no cell phone.

-Opt-outs for all smart utility meters

-Driving an older car with no EMF/RFR

-Financial investment monthly for extra charges for utility meter opt-outs

-Financial investment into RFR/EMF meter, RFR/EMF blocking curtains, tents. clothing for use when outside the home and when traveling to secure these environments.

For reference:

RFR/EMF blocking clothing-$100- $350 per item

RFR/EMF meters- $300- $500 per meter,

RFR/EMF blocking tents- $1500- $3500

RFR/EMF blocking curtains $300 per set

Utility smart meter opt-outs$10 - $75 monthly per meter.

Daily realities:

-No safety from RFR/EMF anywhere outside home.

-Can no longer work outside of home.

-Necessity of RFR/EMF protective clothing & products outside the home.

-Ongoing difficult asks and conversations with family, friends- regularly

-All appliances, cars, computers, devices have to be hard wired and safe with RFR/EMF; immense and time consuming effort maintaining and finding these resources- ongoing

Considerations

-More and more people are seeing biological effects with growing exposures.

-The industry blocking info on biological & environmental harms and thus the solutions. Bio-effects are 100% preventable.

-Regulatory agencies and policy makers are not regulating this discussion due to the immense power of telecom.

-The U.S. has a poor history with environmental toxicants, action not taken on lead for over 70 years after established as unsafe, similarly with asbestos, PFAS, tobacco.

-Our millennials, the first generation to grow up with significantly increasing exposures to RFR/EMF identified as the unhealthiest generation on record according to the Blue Cross Health of America Report. Directly correlates chronologically to increased EMF/RFR exposures

Solutions; Industry, Regulatory Agencies & Policy Makers:

-Formally acknowledging the biological/environmental effects of EMF/RFR

-Instituting safer biological emissions/exposure standards

-Instituting emissions to be capped at 10 Microwatts per meter squared per all devices/infrastructure- align with biological exposure guidelines.

-Instituting safer designs of cell phones, devices, infrastructure

-Instituting “off means off” on all cell phones, wireless systems/devices-no transmitting in airplane or when wireless options are “off.”

-Instituting factory settings of all wireless devices at the lowest setting and making them adjustable.

-Instituting that EMF/RFR emission standards are set and regulated by HHS/FDA/medical/scientific experts.

- Instituting rules prohibiting those regulating telecom in the FCC/HHS/FDA from being employed by the telecommunication industry for at least 5 years before or after their regulatory position has begun/ ended.

-Re-open the TCA and allowing biological/environmental health and safety considerations.

-Review the New Hampshire Commission's 390 page report and use it as a model for protective policy with wireless radiation.

-Institute the industry assuming legal liability for the safety of their products.

Thank you for your consideration and I hope that you will use this inquiry as an opportunity to make the changes that are both doable and will allow for a healthier, safer and better future for us all.

Attached:

-Physicians letter- redacted

-Henry Lai- Genetic Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation

-Heroux/Chamberlin: Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions

-New Hampshire Commission Report

Attachments · 4

Preview: ijerph-20-05398-v3

If the preview is blank, open the PDF in a new tab.

Original public attachments as filed. Their contents are not included in the topic review.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies