Describes environmental sensitivity and isolation, questions cumulative exposure and planning oversight, …

HHS public comment #1296 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-05

#1Describes environmental sensitivity and isolation, questions cumulative exposure and planning oversight, …by Kerryn Bennett » 2026-10-05
AI summary & topic connections

Describes environmental sensitivity and isolation, questions cumulative exposure and planning oversight, and supports precaution and wired alternatives.

  • Electromagnetic sensitivity: on the ANRES Australian National Register of Environmental Sensitivities. I do not lead a normal life and I am forced to live
  • Housing, work & access barriers: ead a normal life and I am forced to live in relative solitude in tranquil surroundings to stay out of EMF as much as
  • Exposure limits & oversight: risprudence in terms of public health that a Precautionary Principle ought to have been applied as many countries have done
  • Li-Fi, fiber & alternatives: y alternatives to EMF tech that includes the fibre optic tech that would mean electricity running through wires
  • Research & federal duties: y local councilors in regards to the lack of cumulative studies and quick permit approvals that are apparently outside

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

Dear HHS Team,

I have been active in Australia fervently raising awareness of cumulative dirty energy, or electrosmog caused by a cacophony of frequencies that disturb our bioelectrical systems.

We begin to wonder if not convinced that most of this irregularity of negative frequency may well be deliberate after the last 6 years of the covid bioweapon debacle.

I will attach a letter I wrote my local councilors in regards to the lack of cumulative studies and quick permit approvals that are apparently outside jurisdiction of the councils that are meant to abide by Health and Well Being in their planning and by the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 which is state law in Victoria.

I am on the ANRES Australian National Register of Environmental Sensitivities.

I do not lead a normal life and I am forced to live in relative solitude in tranquil surroundings to stay out of EMF as much as I possibly can.

You will see the evidence for lack of jurisprudence in terms of public health that a Precautionary Principle ought to have been applied as many countries have done.

Why in two of the most advanced western countries, Australia and US is this not applying. There are many alternatives to EMF tech that includes the fibre optic tech that would mean electricity running through wires not putting immense pressure on our bodies and especially harm to our brain via wireless neural linked tech.

Sincerely

Kerryn Bennett

Please find attached two letters to local council.

A mentioned BioInitiative Report is dated 2012 but this is an exceptional report and warrants reading by the HHS. The link is in the first council letter.

The Summary International EMF Scientist Appeal letter

Additional references to Planetary Electromagnetic Pollution

Attachments · 4

Preview: Letter2_Mayor_Council_on5G_2023

If the preview is blank, open the PDF in a new tab.

Original public attachments as filed. Their contents are not included in the topic review.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies