Describes obtaining precautionary removal of an RF meter and accepting a monthly manual-reading charge be…

HHS public comment #1051 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-09-28

#1Describes obtaining precautionary removal of an RF meter and accepting a monthly manual-reading charge be…by Alex Davie » 2026-09-28
AI summary & topic connections

Describes obtaining precautionary removal of an RF meter and accepting a monthly manual-reading charge because of a spouse’s chemical sensitivity. The wording about whether symptoms occurred is ambiguous.

  • Smart meters: We asked politely if our electricity co-op would remove the RF electricity meter/device from the side of house, directly opposite the kitchen. As a preventative measure on my part,
  • Housing, work & access barriers: tended big project. Since removal was free I am now subject to $19.00 per month fee for having someone come out once a month to physically read the meter but I totally OK with that fe

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

We asked politely if our electricity co-op would remove the RF electricity meter/device from the side of house, directly opposite the kitchen. As a preventative measure on my part, they came out and removed it. It should be noted that they did this install while we were out-town on an extended big project. Since removal was free I am now subject to $19.00 per month fee for having someone come out once a month to physically read the meter but I totally OK with that fee per month. We did notice any symptoms while it was working but since my wife is already chemically sensitive I erred on the side of caution.

Thanking you for taking up this enquiry, on behalf of everyone who may or may not be affected.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies