Describes RF concerns arising from radar-site employment, opposition to a neighborhood tower and involunt…

HHS public comment #5378 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-27

#1Describes RF concerns arising from radar-site employment, opposition to a neighborhood tower and involunt…by Louise Jones » 2026-10-27
AI summary & topic connections

Describes RF concerns arising from radar-site employment, opposition to a neighborhood tower and involuntary smart meters, and concern for wildlife and forest.

  • Occupational exposure: a long time I have been wary of RF. I was a computer analyst at a giant radar site. There I sensed and learned about the adverse effects of this k
  • Towers & siting: nd of energy. Later on, AT&T tried to put a cell tower into my neighborhood. It was frightening to a majority of us who chose to live ina r
  • Smart meters: did not get installed. However, PG&E placed smart meters o our homes without our permission. We just want to live withou
  • Environmental effects: pollution and protect our neighborhood, its wildlife and forest. We don’t need it! We don’t want it!

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

For a long time I have been wary of RF. I was a computer analyst at a giant radar site. There I sensed and learned about the adverse effects of this kind of energy. Later on, AT&T tried to put a cell tower into my neighborhood. It was frightening to a majority of us who chose to live ina rural community. In the end the tower did not get installed. However, PG&E placed smart meters o our homes without our permission. We just want to live without so much pollution and protect our neighborhood, its wildlife and forest. We don’t need it! We don’t want it!

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies