Reports removing a router after adverse effects, opposes newer networks and alleges civilians are being a…

HHS public comment #1497 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-05

#1Reports removing a router after adverse effects, opposes newer networks and alleges civilians are being a…by Chanel Brin » 2026-10-05
AI summary & topic connections

Reports removing a router after adverse effects, opposes newer networks and alleges civilians are being attacked with directed-energy weapons.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

Let me start by saying there were scientists that disclosed years ago that 5G shouldn’t even exist. It’s weaponized and dangerous. They are correct in their assessment. On 5G. Poles are disclosures that it affects people and animals. Why is this even a thing? I had to get rid of my 5G mobile router because of the adverse physical effects from it. I have about 10 EMF plugs around my apartment to try to keep it out of life as much as possible.

I believe everyone in the government already knows this, yet now Trump is pushing for 6G which is proven to destroy human cells.

We need protections and we need them now. We need 5G to not be in existence anymore and we certainly absolutely do need 6G. This is a slow death for us all, and in the end someone will need to answer about why all this was allowed.

Can we please address Directed Energy Weapons next? That ties into this as well.

There are many of us civilians currently being attacked right now.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies