Argues for eliminating human-made RF exposure and removing towers, small cells and Wi-Fi. Reports that a …

HHS public comment #0717 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-09-23

#1Argues for eliminating human-made RF exposure and removing towers, small cells and Wi-Fi. Reports that a …by vinu arumugham » 2026-09-23
AI summary & topic connections

Argues for eliminating human-made RF exposure and removing towers, small cells and Wi-Fi. Reports that a nearby small cell makes part of a backyard unusable; asserted safety conclusions are unverified.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

The only safe level and sources of EMF/RF radiation that humans have evolved to tolerate are gamma rays from earth's natural background radioactivity, radiation from space including solar radiation and lightning. This is not rocket science. It is basic evolutionary biology.

So the only safe level of man-made EMF/RF radiation, is ZERO.

We are experiencing mass poisoning from Electrosmog (RF/EMF, WIFI, Power line ELF radiation, automotive radars), glyphosate/weedkillers, nuclear waste, etc. Makes it easy for each of these industry criminals to blame the others.

When they cheat, ground the fleet. The criminals at Boeing found that out the hard way with the 737 MAX. Now TEAR DOWN ALL CELL TOWERS, SMALL CELLS, WIFI, etc. installations. The cellular telephone and WIFI industry WERE BUILT ON A SAFETY LIE. TEAR THEM ALL DOWN, NOW.

Background RF radiation level at my home itself maims and kills. But half of my backyard is exposed to >30X higher radiation than the background level, due to a small cell installation. Backyard is unusable. This small cell was installed AGAINST MY STRENUOUS OBJECTION.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies