The commenter quotes a cohort-study abstract reporting an association between higher magnetic-field expos…

HHS public comment #6597 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-28

#1The commenter quotes a cohort-study abstract reporting an association between higher magnetic-field expos…by Alex Andreasen » 2026-10-28
AI summary & topic connections

The commenter quotes a cohort-study abstract reporting an association between higher magnetic-field exposure and miscarriage risk in 913 pregnant women, emphasizing the reported risk ratio and exposure measurement.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

913 pregnant women, 2.72 times higher chance of miscarriage with higher magnetic field exposure.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-16623-8

"Magnetic field (MF) non-ionizing radiation is widespread and everyone is exposed to some degree. This prospective cohort study of 913 pregnant women examined the association between high MF exposure and miscarriage risk. Cox (proportional hazards) regression was used to examine the association. After controlling for multiple other factors, women who were exposed to higher MF levels had 2.72 times the risk of miscarriage (hazard ratio = 2.72, 95% CI: 1.42–5.19) than those with lower MF exposure. The increased risk of miscarriage associated with high MF was consistently observed regardless of the sources of high MF. The association was much stronger if MF was measured on a typical day of participants’ pregnancies. The finding also demonstrated that accurate measurement of MF exposure is vital for examining MF health effects. This study provides fresh evidence, directly from a human population, that MF non-ionizing radiation could have adverse biological impacts on human health."

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies