AI summary & topic connections
A healthcare professional expresses concern about developmental effects and requests federal evaluation and research using human and non-animal studies.
- Research & federal duties:
tal effects of wireless radiation using only human and non-animal studies. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal age
- Children & vulnerable groups:
terious effects on the public, especially on infants and children, whose cells are turning over rapidly, causing a chain reaction
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.
I am responding from the perspective of a healthcare professional.
There is substantial scientific evidence that has been collected for some time about how wireless radiation has deleterious effects on the public, especially on infants and children, whose cells are turning over rapidly, causing a chain reaction of negative effects on their development. The damage also occurs in adults and other life. Some countries have already heeded this information to put into place safety regulations to protect them.
I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation using only human and non-animal studies. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.
I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.
Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.