The commenter reports family symptoms and relocation, provides measured exposure comparisons and describe…

HHS public comment #5863 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-28

#1The commenter reports family symptoms and relocation, provides measured exposure comparisons and describe…by Anonymous Anonymous » 2026-10-28
AI summary & topic connections

The commenter reports family symptoms and relocation, provides measured exposure comparisons and describes symptom resolution after reduction, and requests stronger limits and research informed by family experiences.

  • Neurological symptoms & sleep: to move after developing symptoms including headaches, insomnia, nosebleeds, vomiting, muscle spasms, memory issues, and seizure
  • Housing, work & access barriers: from Gigahertz Solutions. My family has been forced to move after developing symptoms including headaches, insomnia, noseble
  • Exposure limits & oversight: protect the public health and to urge you to reconsider the current limits in light of the fact that they are not protective of human or en
  • Research & federal duties: ientific evidence already available, and the need for further study to protect the public health and to urge you to reconsider the c

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

I am a member of the public who has measured radiofrequency radiation using the Safe and Sound Pro II meter as well as electric and magnetic field strengths using the ME 3840B from Gigahertz Solutions. My family has been forced to move after developing symptoms including headaches, insomnia, nosebleeds, vomiting, muscle spasms, memory issues, and seizures from exposure to levels of non-ionizing radiation (RF-EMF peak 500,000+ μW/m2, magnetic field of 400+ nT) below the FCC limit that resolved with dramatically reduced exposure (RF-EMF peak less than 10 μW/m2, magnetic field less than 100 nT). Even childrens’ toys have wireless capabilities today. Establishing truly safe exposure levels is essential. I am writing to encourage you to consider the experiences of families like mine, the weight of scientific evidence already available, and the need for further study to protect the public health and to urge you to reconsider the current limits in light of the fact that they are not protective of human or environmental health. I appreciate your time and attention in reviewing the accompanying studies.

Attachments · 13

Preview: fcvm-1-1499499-2

If the preview is blank, open the PDF in a new tab.

Original public attachments as filed. Their contents are not included in the topic review.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies