AI summary & topic connections
Objects to involuntary wireless exposure and continued rollout without adequate study. Requests evaluation of reported experiences and scientific evidence, research priorities and particular attention to children and other vulnerable groups.
- Exposure limits & oversight:
There needs to be a stop to rolling out products where impacts have not been studied
- Research & federal duties:
identify gaps in current research
- Children & vulnerable groups:
give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.
I am responding from the perspective of a parent, employee & member of a community where exposure is outside my control.
As someone who knows the health impacts of these frequencies, I do not think it is right that we cannot avoid them with our own discernment. I also am appalled that there continues to be rollout without care for the well being of others. There needs to be a stop to rolling out products where impacts have not been studied but if we begin seeing humans harmed in studies, we need to discontinue at all costs.
I support HHS taking an active role in examining the health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside evidence from studies using true scientific process.
I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.
Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.