Reports increasing sensitivity and sleep disruption attributed to wireless radiation, with perceived impr…

HHS public comment #4867 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-26

#1Reports increasing sensitivity and sleep disruption attributed to wireless radiation, with perceived impr…by Sandra Phillips » 2026-10-26
AI summary & topic connections

Reports increasing sensitivity and sleep disruption attributed to wireless radiation, with perceived improvement from a bedroom EMF protector. Raises concerns for grandchildren and future wireless networks and calls on HHS to protect public health.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

I am an 80 year old female retired real estate broker who has experienced watching wireless radiation being increased every year for the last 30 years! Every year we all get more and more exposure! I have become very sensitive to the point that I could feel my nerves being irritated and could not sleep! I had to buy an EMF protector to put in my bedroom so I could sleep. I also have seen the effects of the wireless radiation effecting my grandchildren! Their little bodies are more vulnerable than adults! I always charge my cell phone in another room but the just wifi in the house is G5, and I know the phone companies are all getting geared up to put out G6 wireless that is going to hurt everyone even more and possible kill us! The Department of Health and Human Services was formed to protect humanity! It does not appear to me that you are doing you job! I would think that you would want to start taking your responsibilities more seriously to protect and save humanity who were created by God, the same as you were and in the end we all answer to God!

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies