A healthcare professional, researcher and advocate supports HHS evaluation of wireless-radiation evidence…

HHS public comment #4283 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-24

#1A healthcare professional, researcher and advocate supports HHS evaluation of wireless-radiation evidence…by Dr Rafael “Rafa” Cruz » 2026-10-24
AI summary & topic connections

A healthcare professional, researcher and advocate supports HHS evaluation of wireless-radiation evidence and research prioritizing children and vulnerable populations.

  • Research & federal duties: ther potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for p
  • Children & vulnerable groups: rrent research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a healthcare professional, researcher, and advocate.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies