The commenter asks HHS to explore potential EMF and RF harms, evaluate evidence and experiences, and prio…

HHS public comment #4086 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-22

#1The commenter asks HHS to explore potential EMF and RF harms, evaluate evidence and experiences, and prio…by Ann Hall » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

The commenter asks HHS to explore potential EMF and RF harms, evaluate evidence and experiences, and prioritize research on children and vulnerable groups.

  • Research & federal duties: ther potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.
  • Children & vulnerable groups: rrent research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

Please explore the dangers of EMF and RF. They are not without potential serious harms!

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies