Outlines concerns about cumulative wireless exposure, wiring interference and lighting in schools and hom…

HHS public comment #1166 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-09-30

#1Outlines concerns about cumulative wireless exposure, wiring interference and lighting in schools and hom…by Richard Anthony » 2026-09-30
AI summary & topic connections

Outlines concerns about cumulative wireless exposure, wiring interference and lighting in schools and homes. Requests independent research, exposure measurement, parental disclosure and wired alternatives. Full recommendations are in an unread attachment.

  • Children & vulnerable groups: and actionable recommendations regarding: - Children and Educational Environments: The impacts of dense wireless infrastructure, school-
  • Power lines, wiring & solar: exposure, conducted electrical interference (dirty electricity), electrohypersensitivity (EHS), and lighting/electric
  • Electromagnetic sensitivity: electrical interference (dirty electricity), electrohypersensitivity (EHS), and lighting/electrical stressors in homes, sch
  • LED headlights & glare: astructure, school-mandated Chromebooks, and classroom lighting/dimmers. - Real-World Aggregate Exposure: The necessity of mea
  • Neurological symptoms & sleep: ological plausibility, mitochondrial health, sleep architecture, and the lived realities of electrohypersensitive indi
  • Proposed biological mechanisms: eurological Health: Biological plausibility, mitochondrial health, sleep architecture, and the lived realities of electr
  • Li-Fi, fiber & alternatives: gineering Alternatives: Proximity reduction, wired Ethernet alternatives (USB-to-RJ45 adapters), manual wireless r
  • Research & federal duties: losure in schools. Thank you for your time, independent research, and consideration of these public health safeguards.
  • Wi-Fi & indoor exposure: alternatives (USB-to-RJ45 adapters), manual wireless radio deactivation, and transparent parental disclosure in schools. Than

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

Public Comment and Policy Recommendations Regarding Aggregate RF, EMF, Conducted Electrical Interference, and Child/School Exposure

Please see the attached document for my full public comment. I am submitting these comments to address the critical public-health implications of prolonged, cumulative, multi-source radiofrequency (RF) and electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, conducted electrical interference (dirty electricity), electrohypersensitivity (EHS), and lighting/electrical stressors in homes, schools, and communities.

The attached document outlines specific concerns and actionable recommendations regarding:

- Children and Educational Environments: The impacts of dense wireless infrastructure, school-mandated Chromebooks, and classroom lighting/dimmers.

- Real-World Aggregate Exposure: The necessity of measuring cumulative environmental loads beyond isolated laboratory conditions.

- Systemic and Neurological Health: Biological plausibility, mitochondrial health, sleep architecture, and the lived realities of electrohypersensitive individuals.

- Practical Engineering Alternatives: Proximity reduction, wired Ethernet alternatives (USB-to-RJ45 adapters), manual wireless radio deactivation, and transparent parental disclosure in schools.

Thank you for your time, independent research, and consideration of these public health safeguards.

Respectfully submitted,

Richard Anthony

Individual member of the public / consumer / family and community perspective

Docket No.: HHS-OASH-2026-0397

Attachments · 1

Preview: HHS-OASH-2026-0397

If the preview is blank, open the PDF in a new tab.

Original public attachments as filed. Their contents are not included in the topic review.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies