Objects to residential antenna placement without adequate health protection or consent. Requests monitori…

HHS public comment #0987 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-09-28

#1Objects to residential antenna placement without adequate health protection or consent. Requests monitori…by Wendy Pond » 2026-09-28
AI summary & topic connections

Objects to residential antenna placement without adequate health protection or consent. Requests monitoring, rights protections and compensation for costs associated with shielding and legal action.

  • Exposure limits & oversight: hout reported adverse effects having been avoided or remedied; and Without the democratic agreement of residents living within reach and sight of the technology; and Without adequate monitoring of t
  • Towers & siting: where there are gaps in necessary protection for long term public health. Cell masts capable of RF transmission are being installed in residential streets— Without long term effects h
  • Housing, work & access barriers: e telecom companies are not required to remedy loss of good health, nor pay for shielding materials to avoid effects, nor compensate loss of pleasure in life. There is no provision for th

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

SUMMARY

This submission identifies four areas where there are gaps in necessary protection for long term public health.

Cell masts capable of RF transmission are being installed in residential streets—

Without long term effects having been proven safe for human and wildlife health; and

Without reported adverse effects having been avoided or remedied; and

Without the democratic agreement of residents living within reach and sight of the technology; and

Without adequate monitoring of transmission levels.

The regulatory authorities are failing to protect human and wildlife wellbeing in these four ways.

Issues of public concern regarding positioning of cell masts in residential areas:

The telecom companies are not required to remedy loss of good health, nor pay for shielding materials to avoid effects, nor compensate loss of pleasure in life.

There is no provision for the public to have rights of objection to the choice of site for a cell mast, nor rights to compensation and fair settlement.

Recourse to legal processes is beyond the means of most households. That is, the costs of shielding materials, re-designing bedrooms where children sleep, and “leaving all fair” should fall on the telecommunication companies and not on the householder.

DETAILS IN DOCUMENT ATTACHED “Pond Submission”

Attachments · 1

Preview: POND SUBMISSION to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) September 2026

If the preview is blank, open the PDF in a new tab.

Original public attachments as filed. Their contents are not included in the topic review.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies