AI summary & topic connections
A concerned parent and animal advocate opposes tower placement, reports tinnitus after a nearby installation, and raises wildlife and surveillance concerns. Supports HHS research and attention to vulnerable groups.
- Towers & siting:
There has been a 5/6G tower placed close by my house
- Neurological symptoms & sleep:
my ears are ringing off the charts
- Environmental effects:
very critical animal habitat
- Reproduction & pregnancy:
interrupt mating cycles of animals
- Surveillance & privacy concerns:
CONTROL AND TRACK EVERY PERSON ON EARTH
- Research & federal duties:
identify gaps in current research
- Children & vulnerable groups:
give particular attention to children
- Exposure limits & oversight:
BAN THESE TOWERS
I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.
I am responding from the perspective of a concerned parent animal advocate. The FCC is trying to pass laws that will allow the invasive placement of 5/6G towers in very critical animal habitat and next to residential homes.
Why did the United States government STOP testing the effects of these deadly frequencies? These frequencies have been shown to kill trees close to them, interrupt mating cycles of animals, sickness and DEATH!!!
There has been a 5/6G tower placed close by my house and ever since this happened, roughly a year ago, my ears are ringing off the charts.
STOP POISONING HUMANS AND ANIMALS WITH DEALY FREQUENCIES THAT HAVE NOT BEEN TESTED FOR A LONG PERIOD OF TIME! BAN THESE TOWERS THAT ARE NOT FOR BETTER CELL RECEPTION - THEY ARE SIMPLY A CONTROL MECHANISM FOR THE GLOBAL PLAN FOR SMART CITIES TO CONTROL AND TRACK EVERY PERSON ON EARTH!
I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.
I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.
Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.
Sincerely from a Concerned American Patriot,
Dana Fortson
Attachments · 2
