The commenter reports skin symptoms after visits to a tower-adjacent training site near children's facili…

HHS public comment #0314 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-09-22

#1The commenter reports skin symptoms after visits to a tower-adjacent training site near children's facili…by Joshua Whitley » 2026-09-22
AI summary & topic connections

The commenter reports skin symptoms after visits to a tower-adjacent training site near children's facilities and requests lower exposure and independently funded research.

  • Towers & siting: There's a spot in Medford Oregon where I have trained dogs, and there is a large antenna Tower located right in the middle of the facility.
  • Children & vulnerable groups: Directly above a Little League diamond where children play baseball, and adjacent to the Boy Scout building.
  • Electromagnetic sensitivity: I am personally very sensitive to my environment and believe that RF sensitivity is part of that.
  • Research & federal duties: I would be appreciative of less exposure to RF, and better funding of truly independent science.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

There's a spot in Medford Oregon where I have trained dogs, and there is a large antenna Tower located right in the middle of the facility. Directly above a Little League diamond where children play baseball, and adjacent to the Boy Scout building. After spending several weekends there, I began to notice that I did not feel good. I did break out in a rash after the third weekend, which is very unusual. I have not experienced that since I stopped going to that spot. There was another weekend with the dog training seminar this past year, and a friend of mine experienced the skin of her face shedding cells similar to a chemical skin peel, after she spent 3 days at the site. I am personally very sensitive to my environment and believe that RF sensitivity is part of that. I would be appreciative of less exposure to RF, and better funding of truly independent science. Not science-funded by the wireless companies that stand to make lots of money off of further expanding Wireless rf.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies