Reports acute EHS symptoms following a base-station upgrade, a pet tumor and profound social and access l…

HHS public comment #5537 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-27

#1Reports acute EHS symptoms following a base-station upgrade, a pet tumor and profound social and access l…by Anonymous Anonymous » 2026-10-27
AI summary & topic connections

Reports acute EHS symptoms following a base-station upgrade, a pet tumor and profound social and access limitations, and requests review of nonthermal and cumulative effects.

  • Electromagnetic sensitivity: nsuing Days: I developed immediate and acute Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) symptoms, including physical discomfort around wireless de
  • Towers & siting: re and Onset of Symptoms • June 11, 2021: A mobile phone base station 550 metres from my home (RFNSA Site ID: 6280011) underwent a maj
  • Neurological symptoms & sleep: window, I was awoken from a deep sleep by an intense neurological sensation which was like a massive bolt or flash of power enteri
  • Environmental effects: ditions, seizures, or fits. Concurrently, my household pet developed an acute tumor that required surgical removal. I subse
  • Cancer & tumors: Concurrently, my household pet developed an acute tumor that required surgical removal. I subsequently enrolled in forma
  • Housing, work & access barriers: ability to participate in everyday life. My access to public spaces, transit, and accommodation is profoundly limited due to
  • Exposure limits & oversight: ion to my health indicates a critical gap in current safety thresholds. In support of this statement, I attach and reference the follow

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

Public Comment Submission to the FCC and HHS

Regarding: Request for Scientific Evidence on the Health and Environmental Impacts of

Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation

Submitter: Anonymous, 56-year-old female, Western Australia

1. Timeline of Exposure and Onset of Symptoms

• June 11, 2021: A mobile phone base station 550 metres from my home (RFNSA Site ID:

6280011) underwent a major upgrade, introducing multiple new frequency bands (700MHz

to 2600MHz).

• June 12, 2021: I experienced severe, inexplicable thermal sensations ("heating up") on my

back while in my bedroom. So the next night, I changed rooms.

• Night of June 13 / Morning of June 14, 2021 (6:00 AM): While sleeping in a middle bedroom

with a west-facing window, I was awoken from a deep sleep by an intense neurological

sensation which was like a massive bolt or flash of power entering the left side of my brain

and which seemingly had entered through the west side of my home.

• Ensuing Days: I developed immediate and acute Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS)

symptoms, including physical discomfort around wireless devices and localized paresthesia

("tiny shocks") when entering my home office.

2. Context and Observations

Prior to June 2021, I was in excellent health with no history of neurological conditions, seizures, or

fits. Concurrently, my household pet developed an acute tumor that required surgical removal. I

subsequently enrolled in formal electrobiology studies (commencing January 2022), where the

academic coursework directly mirrored and explained the physiological symptoms I was experiencing

in real-time.

3. Long-Term Life and Social Impact

The onset of EHS has severely restricted my ability to participate in everyday life. My access to public

spaces, transit, and accommodation is profoundly limited due to the ubiquity of central Wi-Fi,

integrated automotive Bluetooth, and unshielded wireless infrastructure. Managing this condition

requires an incredibly isolated lifestyle and constant environmental modifications, devastating my social and professional life.

4. Conclusion and Regulatory Request

The precise correlation between the activation of new macro-cell frequency bands and the sudden,

permanent disruption to my health indicates a critical gap in current safety thresholds. In support of

this statement, I attach and reference the following peer-reviewed studies:

• Hardell & Carlberg (2025): "The WHO-commissioned systematic reviews on health effects of

radiofrequency radiation provide no assurance of safety."

• Frank et al. (2022): "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC

and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G."

I urge the FCC and HHS to move away from outdated static models and comprehensively review nonthermal, cumulative biological impacts on humans and local ecosystems.

Attachments · 2

Preview: s12940-022-00900-9

If the preview is blank, open the PDF in a new tab.

Original public attachments as filed. Their contents are not included in the topic review.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies