Cites historical RF research to request health advisories and device labels, criticizes tower density and…

HHS public comment #5504 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-27

#1Cites historical RF research to request health advisories and device labels, criticizes tower density and…by Anonymous Anonymous » 2026-10-27
AI summary & topic connections

Cites historical RF research to request health advisories and device labels, criticizes tower density and wireless utility meters, and advocates safer technology use.

  • Research & federal duties: of RF wireless radiation exposures from the Naval Medical Research Institute Study titled, “Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena and Clini
  • Exposure limits & oversight: en time and how it can damage your eyesight. Require labeling to display a similar message on these digital devices just like
  • Cancer & tumors: warning about RF radiation exposures being a possible carcinogen or harmful to your health with overuse or improper use of any di
  • Towers & siting: ver, overdensification of neighborhoods with 175’ cell towers for Internet of Things, no wired alternative to smart meters and
  • Smart meters: Internet of Things, no wired alternative to smart meters and turning vehicles into mobile base stations is going in the w
  • Li-Fi, fiber & alternatives: 175’ cell towers for Internet of Things, no wired alternative to smart meters and turning vehicles into mobile base stations i

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

The US has known for at least since 1971 about the bioeffects of RF wireless radiation exposures from the Naval Medical Research Institute Study titled, “Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation.” The study listed pages of symptoms resulting from RF exposures that were compiled from over 2,000 global citations on non-ionizing electromagnetic fields proving non-thermal injuries are a common side effect. Many independent studies have been done since then with similar results. There is nothing new under the sun to continue the wait to decide if RF radiation exposures can be harmful. Issue a surgeon general letter warning about RF radiation exposures being a possible carcinogen or harmful to your health with overuse or improper use of any digital device, especially with digital screen time and how it can damage your eyesight. Require labeling to display a similar message on these digital devices just like cigarettes and nicotine. Technology can be beneficial, if it is built, used and taught to be used in a safe and responsible manner. However, overdensification of neighborhoods with 175’ cell towers for Internet of Things, no wired alternative to smart meters and turning vehicles into mobile base stations is going in the wrong direction, consumes too much energy, generates too much electropollution, and makes healthy people chronically ill and/or disabled unnecessarily.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies