The commenter recounts advocacy for residents of a low-income building with a rooftop 5G station, reports…

HHS public comment #4075 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-22

#1The commenter recounts advocacy for residents of a low-income building with a rooftop 5G station, reports…by David Goldberg » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

The commenter recounts advocacy for residents of a low-income building with a rooftop 5G station, reports illness, a cancer diagnosis and pet deaths, and highlights residents' limited ability to relocate while seeking federal support.

  • Towers & siting: till suffering greatly from the effects of a 5G base station placed on the roof of their building. People in the building got
  • Housing, work & access barriers: e building, many just did or do not have the means to move out and remain there suffering. Wireless radiation, especially 5G, d
  • Cancer & tumors: em moved out. A woman right below the tower, developed cancer. Pets died. Neither the city, nor the building owner, refused to
  • Environmental effects: man right below the tower, developed cancer. Pets died. Neither the city, nor the building owner, refused to do anythin
  • Research & federal duties: ther potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health. Thank you for p
  • Children & vulnerable groups: rrent research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.

I am responding from the perspective of a concerned member of the public.

Though I am one of the fortunate ones who is not electromagnetic sensitive, I advocted in front of the Loveland, CO, city council on behalf of residents of the "Artspace" building on 5th St. in downtown Loveland, who suffered and are still suffering greatly from the effects of a 5G base station placed on the roof of their building. People in the building got extremely sick and a number of them moved out. A woman right below the tower, developed cancer. Pets died. Neither the city, nor the building owner, refused to do anything about it. Fortunately, the ones who moved out recovered. Since it is a low-income building, many just did or do not have the means to move out and remain there suffering. Wireless radiation, especially 5G, does not align with the natural electromagnetic rate of the human body, therefore is just plain dangerous. I have taken a stand against this technology and gave up my cellphone in 2020. Unfortunately, the world we live in is built on wireless technology to a good extent right now, so we need the support of HHS and the FCC desperately.

I support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.

I urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health.

Thank you for providing individuals and families with an opportunity to be heard.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies