The commenter considers low-energy radiation safe and prefers public-health attention to ecological disas…

HHS public comment #3891 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-21

#1The commenter considers low-energy radiation safe and prefers public-health attention to ecological disas…by Carl Schneider » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections

The commenter considers low-energy radiation safe and prefers public-health attention to ecological disasters and chemical contamination of water.

  • Research & federal duties: Based on current science, these are safe types of low energy radiation. I am not worried
  • Environmental effects: radiation. I would rather spend our time on ecological disasters and fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticide leaking into our wate

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

Based on current science, these are safe types of low energy radiation. I am not worried about this type of radiation. I would rather spend our time on ecological disasters and fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticide leaking into our water and causing cancer.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies