AI summary & topic connections
Calls for minimum necessary exposure limits and independent scientific input, citing cancer concerns and opposing 6G.
- Exposure limits & oversight:
E DEVICES IN THE AREA SHOULD BE THE ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF RADIATION ALLOWED. 4G worked just fine. Then
- Cancer & tumors:
d worked the same as 4G but gave more people cancer. Now, they want to implement 6G. For what? To finish u
- Research & federal duties:
n't listen to them! Find good, uncompromised scientists and create standards that prioritize health over funct
We try our best to eat healthy, organic, free range, grass fed, etc. We're careful to use only natural deodorants, soaps and detergents. We get sunlight, we take vitamins. All these things we can control but the amount of radiation we're being blasted with is totally outside of our control. We, the citizens of this country, have to rely on the government to do the right thing when it comes to the amount of radiation we're exposed to. We know that the government very often DOES NOT do the right thing. So, since you are requesting comments, how about this: THE ABSOLUTE BARE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION NEEDED TO RUN THE DEVICES IN THE AREA SHOULD BE THE ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF RADIATION ALLOWED. 4G worked just fine. Then 5G, which is much more dangerous, came along and worked the same as 4G but gave more people cancer. Now, they want to implement 6G. For what? To finish us off? Stop it! Just stop it!
The "industry professionals" only care about making their machines work. They do not care about the people being harmed. Don't listen to them! Find good, uncompromised scientists and create standards that prioritize health over functionality. If anyone can do it, RFKJr can do it. Be the man who saves us!