A physician argues that nonthermal EMF changes biological signaling and requests protection, citing a neu…

HHS public comment #6143 · HHS-OASH-2026-0397 · 2026-10-28

#1A physician argues that nonthermal EMF changes biological signaling and requests protection, citing a neu…by Jeffrey Rouse, M.D. » 2026-10-28
AI summary & topic connections

A physician argues that nonthermal EMF changes biological signaling and requests protection, citing a neuronal-culture study.

  • Proposed biological mechanisms: ng in Brain Injury. It's simple. EMF changes biological signaling in a detrimental way, even at levels FAR below thermal effects.
  • Neurological symptoms & sleep: below thermal effects. It is no less than a neurotoxin that our government has failed to protect us from. Change that.
  • Research & federal duties: us from. Change that. For one of a thousand studies on this topic, see Int J Radiat Biol. 2026;102(4):421-434. doi:

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

Triple board certified physician here including in Brain Injury. It's simple. EMF changes biological signaling in a detrimental way, even at levels FAR below thermal effects. It is no less than a neurotoxin that our government has failed to protect us from. Change that. For one of a thousand studies on this topic, see Int J Radiat Biol. 2026;102(4):421-434. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2026.2617592. Neurotoxic effects of 3.5 GHz GSM-like RF exposure on cultured DRG neurons: a mechanistic insight into oxidative and apoptotic pathways.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official HHS filing.

Replies