AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079292
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079292
All FCC comments · page 98
2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079291
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079291
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079290
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079290
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079289
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079289
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079288
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079288
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079287
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079287
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079286
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079286
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079285
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079285
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079284
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079284
"Radiation Sickness" has been well known since WWII. You do not need to "ask the public" if it exists or what they think about it. This is not a matter of public opinion, it is a matter of safety and health. How about just doing the right thing and recognizing that EMF is toxic and can cause illness and death as any legitimate scientist will tell you. Government agencies have pretended this problem does not exist because of pressure an inappropriate influence from telcoms and wireless industries. That is corruption, not public service. That pretense is inexcusable and must be ended.
AI summary & topic connections
- Towers, antennas & siting:
There has been no current since the 4G and 5G telephones have caused EMF radiation damage to human beings.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
We have not studied the effects that I am aware of.
Original comment · unedited text
26110079282
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079282
There has been no current since the 4G and 5G telephones have caused EMF radiation damage to human beings. Many brain cancers on the Campus of SDSU in San Diego. Not sure if it the servers on campus or the other products installed by att, verizon, etc. We have not studied the effects that I am aware of. If you Look up IEEE WBAN 802.15.6 you will see that we are electrical beings and the companies have set up equipment to track through nodes (human bodies) our signal we each have one. This means they are capable of tracking us and sending a signal to kill us. Unless you are not aware there has been a man studying the Havana Syndrome patients for 20 years. It is appauling you have let it go this far.
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079281
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079281
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079280
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079280
Official documents · 3
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079279
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079279
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079278
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079278
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079272
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079272
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
There are two issues if landlines are discontinued: 1) possible adverse health effects of those who have to rely only on cell phones.
- Wired connections & alternatives:
There are two issues if landlines are discontinued: 1) possible adverse health effects of those who have to rely only on cell phones.
Original comment · unedited text
26110079270
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079270
There are two issues if landlines are discontinued: 1) possible adverse health effects of those who have to rely only on cell phones. 2) vulnerable populations who need access to medical help if cell service goes out 25% of the population uses landlines! There is a 90 day rule, which has not been followed! Please listen to Americans! Cynthia Crawford
AI summary & topic connections
- Children, schools & development:
They wanted to put 5G small cell towers into our town (every 500 ft or something like that), even in front of schools where children are the most vulnerable.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
They wanted to put 5G small cell towers into our town (every 500 ft or something like that), even in front of schools where children are the most vulnerable.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
I can't do Facetime on an my I-Phone, because it feels like my face is burning.
- Wildlife & environment:
And please do your due diligence to make sure these electromagnetic frequencies are actually safe for people and animals, bees, etc.
Original comment · unedited text
26110079269
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079269
I am extremely sensitive to Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and wireless radiation. I can't do Facetime on an my I-Phone, because it feels like my face is burning. I can't talk to someone on the I-Phone for very long, because I can feel the radiation. It is very uncomfortable, even when the phone is 3 feet away. I don't even have one of the newer, bigger I-Phones, because I fear it might be stronger. My husband and I pull out the router before bed every night so that we are not bathing in WiFi. We were not able to get solar for our house, because of the EMFs/energy they emit. A couple of years ago, our town of Great Barrington, MA was threatened by the telecom companies. They wanted to put 5G small cell towers into our town (every 500 ft or something like that), even in front of schools where children are the most vulnerable. Please help us (all of us) prevent anything like that ever happening. And please do your due diligence to make sure these electromagnetic frequencies are actually safe for people and animals, bees, etc. Thank you for listening! Lori Deutsch
AI summary & topic connections
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
In 1996 cell phones were called "car phones " and were novelties!
- Court remand & agency accountability:
Current health related issues have been squelched by the telecom industry's greed.
Original comment · unedited text
26110079255
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079255
Current regulations are archaic and are based on little fact or knowledge, designed by telecom companies for their profit! In 1996 cell phones were called "car phones " and were novelties! Current health related issues have been squelched by the telecom industry's greed. It is time for new laws which protect the public!
AI summary & topic connections
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
For example, one study, Effects of Short and Long Term Electromagnetic Fields Exposure on the Human Hippocampus.
Original comment · unedited text
26110079245
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079245
The FCC must update the requirements to protect public health from the effects of wireless radiation. This technology has exploded to being omnipresent in a short time period with disregard for a growing body of evidence of harm to humans and other species. For example, one study, Effects of Short and Long Term Electromagnetic Fields Exposure on the Human Hippocampus. Deniz, O.G., et al. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 5(4):191-197. (2017). Could help explain the profound health impacts a good friend experiences in direct response to wireless radiation. The current scientific literature must be taken seriously to protect life from harmful exposure. Clearly guidelines that are 30 years old based on even older studies are irrelevant in today's world.
AI summary & topic connections
- Cancer & tumors:
The court issued a mandate that the FCC show proper examination of evidence on its record related to non-cancer health effects (such as impacts to reproduction, brain development and the immune system), long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, and environmental impacts.
- Children, schools & development:
The court issued a mandate that the FCC show proper examination of evidence on its record related to non-cancer health effects (such as impacts to reproduction, brain development and the immune system), long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, and environmental impacts.
- Pregnancy & reproduction:
The court issued a mandate that the FCC show proper examination of evidence on its record related to non-cancer health effects (such as impacts to reproduction, brain development and the immune system), long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, and environmental impacts.
- Wildlife & environment:
court of appeals ruled that the FCC's decision was arbitrary and capricious, finding it failed to show proper review in regards to numerous issues related to public health and the environment.
- Exposure limits & testing:
Nonthermal effects of radiofrequency-field exposure on calcium dynamics in stem cell-derived neuronal cells: elucidation of calcium pathways.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
In a 2021 the U.S.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
The court issued a mandate that the FCC show proper examination of evidence on its record related to non-cancer health effects (such as impacts to reproduction, brain development and the immune system), long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, and environmental impacts.
Original comment · unedited text
26110079244
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079244
Is the FCC actually protecting public health? In a 2021 the U.S. court of appeals ruled that the FCC's decision was arbitrary and capricious, finding it failed to show proper review in regards to numerous issues related to public health and the environment. The court issued a mandate that the FCC show proper examination of evidence on its record related to non-cancer health effects (such as impacts to reproduction, brain development and the immune system), long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, and environmental impacts. If it is indeed true that this is a complex issue and that the FCC needs more time, then why hasn't the FCC stopped the roll out of wireless technology given that it is clear that it is harmful to our biology and mental health? I am citing a study, one of thousands, to remind the FCC that you are an organization that was created to protect human health, and to regulate, not stand by while humans remain vulnerable and negatively affected by the proliferation of wireless technology that invades my personal, professional and social existence. Rao VS, Titushkin IA, Moros EG, Pickard WF, Thatte HS, Cho MR. Nonthermal effects of radiofrequency-field exposure on calcium dynamics in stem cell-derived neuronal cells: elucidation of calcium pathways. Radiat Res. 2008 Mar;169(3):319-29. doi: 10.1667/RR1118.1. PMID: 18302487.
Loading more comments…