AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079686
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079686
All FCC comments · page 92
2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.
AI summary & topic connections
- Sleep & neurological concerns:
Please instead concentrate on expanding wired connections to computers and phones, which don't have the same health concerns.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
I am also against the placing of cell towers near people's homes.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
Please instead concentrate on expanding wired connections to computers and phones, which don't have the same health concerns.
- Wired connections & alternatives:
Please instead concentrate on expanding wired connections to computers and phones, which don't have the same health concerns.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
These health effects need to be studied.
Original comment · unedited text
26110079681
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079681
I am deeply concern about the negative health effects of wireless radiation. These health effects need to be studied. I am also against the placing of cell towers near people's homes. Please instead concentrate on expanding wired connections to computers and phones, which don't have the same health concerns.
AI summary & topic connections
- Cancer & tumors:
The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
- Children, schools & development:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
You may wish to describe how wireless radiation has affected you, your child or family; health effects or cancer you have experienced; concerns about long-term exposure; experiences involving cell phones, Wi-Fi, cell towers or other wireless sources; or impacts you have observed on animals, wildlife, plants, or the environment.] I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Wildlife & environment:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Exposure limits & testing:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Original comment · unedited text
26110079678
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079678
I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: [Please add your personal story here. You may wish to describe how wireless radiation has affected you, your child or family; health effects or cancer you have experienced; concerns about long-term exposure; experiences involving cell phones, Wi-Fi, cell towers or other wireless sources; or impacts you have observed on animals, wildlife, plants, or the environment.] I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.
AI summary & topic connections
- Sensitivity & health experiences:
This issue matters to me personally because: While in the military I developed migraines and vertigo that were triggered by high EMF environments.
- Cancer & tumors:
The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
- Children, schools & development:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Biological mechanisms & metabolism:
Non ionizing radiation is more likely to affect the calcium channels of the body therefore showing damage later in a persons life that is not expressed by thermal damage.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
We use to call the cone of the antenna in front of the jet the cone of cancer.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Wildlife & environment:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Exposure limits & testing:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Original comment · unedited text
26110079675 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079675 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: While in the military I developed migraines and vertigo that were triggered by high EMF environments. Moreover, It is well know that HF radios in fighter jets cause cancer. Please reference any fighter jet systems manual. We use to call the cone of the antenna in front of the jet the cone of cancer. There are notes, warnings and cautions pertaining to this danger. While there are different frequency ranges to the many avionics in a fighter jet some of these frequency bands reserved for the military have been released for use by the tech industry within the civilian population(Why?). There is a clear…
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079662
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079662
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
- Sensitivity & health experiences:
I even have it connected to an ethernet cable and still the EMF's and Wifi disturb me, and cause a loss of energy, headaches, and a feeling like I am car sick.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
I am very Wifi and EMF sensitive.
- Wired connections & alternatives:
I even have it connected to an ethernet cable and still the EMF's and Wifi disturb me, and cause a loss of energy, headaches, and a feeling like I am car sick.
Original comment · unedited text
26110079634
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079634
I am very Wifi and EMF sensitive. I start to feel ill when I work on my computer for more than 15 minutes. I even have it connected to an ethernet cable and still the EMF's and Wifi disturb me, and cause a loss of energy, headaches, and a feeling like I am car sick. I am extra sensitive to the cell phone. I use a Samsung S8 phone because of the low SARS rating, but even with this phone, I get a pain in my left ear when I am within one foot of the phone. I put it on airplane mode when I talk. I know people who are way more WiFi and EMF sensitive than I am. This is a real issue that impacts the health and lives of many people like me. Please help to address this problem. Thank you. Deborah
AI summary & topic connections
- Towers, antennas & siting:
Typo on the previous redaction 5g has created a new human race not 4g, 5g
Original comment · unedited text
26110079622
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079622
Typo on the previous redaction 5g has created a new human race not 4g, 5g
AI summary & topic connections
- Towers, antennas & siting:
I filed a previous comment and need to retract, wifi ax is saving everyone's life as is the modem routers based off of coax for residential use, 5g and mmwave still believe has changed the world completely and has radiated everyone physically however it might be necessary due to lack of 3g and cable tv over coax as it is seemingly anabolic in nature as well as radiating, I don't knkw the answer I just know everything has changed and I don't like the physical bodies of the human race now due to 5g and mmwave I think physically we were all maybe healthier with 3g even if we were all angrier, I t
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
I filed a previous comment and need to retract, wifi ax is saving everyone's life as is the modem routers based off of coax for residential use, 5g and mmwave still believe has changed the world completely and has radiated everyone physically however it might be necessary due to lack of 3g and cable tv over coax as it is seemingly anabolic in nature as well as radiating, I don't knkw the answer I just know everything has changed and I don't like the physical bodies of the human race now due to 5g and mmwave I think physically we were all maybe healthier with 3g even if we were all angrier, I t
Original comment · unedited text
26110079620
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079620
I filed a previous comment and need to retract, wifi ax is saving everyone's life as is the modem routers based off of coax for residential use, 5g and mmwave still believe has changed the world completely and has radiated everyone physically however it might be necessary due to lack of 3g and cable tv over coax as it is seemingly anabolic in nature as well as radiating, I don't knkw the answer I just know everything has changed and I don't like the physical bodies of the human race now due to 5g and mmwave I think physically we were all maybe healthier with 3g even if we were all angrier, I think 4g has ceated a new race of humans that are pacifier radiated physically and inseparable to their phones, I don't know the answer j don't like what I see I cant be apart of it and I also cant be not apart of it, I have my own issues that are perhaps way worst than the 5g human species have, I hope for the best I would like to try 3g towns if available someday to go back to those days Parker
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079571
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079571
Official documents · 3
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079557
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079557
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079556
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079556
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
- Exposure limits & testing:
The world has changed dramatically since the FCC adopted its human exposure guidelines in 1996, based on science from the 1980s.
Original comment · unedited text
26110079555
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079555
Review of the adverse health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation is long overdue. The world has changed dramatically since the FCC adopted its human exposure guidelines in 1996, based on science from the 1980s.
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079554
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079554
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079553
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079553
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079551
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079551
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079550
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079550
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079548
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079548
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079547
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079547
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079546
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079546
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110079545
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079545
Official documents · 2
Loading more comments…