All FCC comments · page 89

26110080208

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080208

26110080207

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080207

26110080206

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080206

26110080193

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080193

26110080157

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080157

Can only use my mobile phone on 4G, 5G rapidly creates nausea, headaches and generalised substantial discomfort, disappearing quite quickly after change from 5G to 4G. Updating my mobile phone on wifi always creates a headache within a few minutes, wifi off after completion. This reflects research such as: "Rev Environ Health. 2017 Sep 26;32(3):291-299. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2017-0014. Functional brain MRI in patients complaining of electrohypersensitivity after long term exposure to electromagnetic fields. Gunnar Heuser 1, Sylvia A Heuser 1" showing emf sensitivity is associated with distinct fMRI scans. "Electromagn Biol Med. 2006;25(4):245-58. doi: 10.1080/15368370601044150. Electrohypersensitivity: state-of-the-art of a functional impairment. Olle Johansson 1" Where in Sweden: "In Sweden, electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is an officially fully recognized functional impairment (i.e., it is not regarded as a disease). Survey studies show that somewhere between 230,000-290,000 Swedish men and women report a variety of symptoms when being in contact with electromagnetic field (EMF) sources." "Int J Prev Med. 2018 Jul 20:9:61. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_70_17. eCollection 2018. Mobile Phone Distance from Head and Temperature Changes of Radio Frequency Waves on Brain Tissue Farhad Forouharmajd 1, Hossein Ebrahimi 1, Siamak Pourabdian 1" recorded tissue temperature changes from emf. and: "Environ Res. 2018 Jul:164:405-416. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.035. Epub 2018 Mar 21. Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health. Martin L Pall 1" Summarises the effects of emf on human biology. These papers are part of a growing body of research confirming the experience of many like my self who have direct experience of discomfort in emf fields. That was brought home most clearly years ago when using a laptop on wifi, on initiating a video call, it felt as though my arms were burning, an experience that subsided quite quickly after the call finished.

26110080148

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080148

I have been negatively affected by wireless radiation. I had to leave my medical career due to not being able to work with all the wireless infrastructure surrounding me. Please take steps to lessen the toxic nnEMF in workplace environments, schools and neighborhoods. Thank you for taking the time to read my comment.

26110080128 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080128 Before addressing the core matter of this submission, I must formally object to the absurd and needlessly restrictive architecture of the FCC’s public comment system. It is painfully obvious that this interface is designed to suppress public participation rather than encourage it, effectively shutting out the average citizen from participating in having their concerns heard and considered. Unlike the Department of Health and Human Services, which transparently routes public feedback through their centralized, user-friendly Regulations.gov portal, the FCC forces the public to navigate its own proprietary Electronic Comment Filing System. The FCC’s system does not even allow simple keywords and instead the user must use a highly specific numeric docket number (13-84) just to find the submission box. Unless you are actively tracking the court transcripts of current lawsuits against this agency, you will not know about this bracket number. By burying public comment portals behind an obscure and independent interface, the FCC has built a systemic barrier to entry. If a regulatory agency genuinely cares about public input, its systems should be built for the public, not just for corporate lawyers in insider litigants. But this is not merely a problem with how the FCC receives public comments. It is a problem with what happens when those comments are made and the agency fails to adequately respond to the human consequences. My complaint is real. It is personal, documented, and ongoing. As you are fully aware, the current RF exposure guidelines date back to 1996. In more than 30 years since those guidelines were established, wireless technology and the number and proximity of wireless transmitting facilities have changed dramatically. Yet the regulatory framework governing RF exposure has not kept pace with those changes. I live in Florida where state law allows communication facilities, including small wireless facilities, to be placed within public right of ways; Florida Statute 337.401. In my case, that regulatory framework resulted in a 5G small cell installation being placed on the swale adjacent to my…

Read the full comment →

26110080121

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080121

I'm writing in regards to the FCCs lack of response to the D.C Court of Appeals remand concerning it's decades old - radio frequency (RF) radiofrequency exposure guidelines. The FCC has had more than enough time to review and address the evidence by the 9th Circuit Court win, on August 13, 2021. This has to be done! Enough lives have already been taken and ruined! This will effect the most vulnerable and already has. I've done extensive research and the ITU BDT (R-T-D) IPEC-WB-WRC-GSR- Plenipotentiary, via the Department of State has to be stopped! We have an industry and government that are both rogue. Not only is wireless harmful it DOES cause cancers! The new P25 warnings out of CA state on the new 5GHz phones "May cause reproductive harm." Since when do we test (never tested) cell phones for RF harm, using a plastic head! Now we are dealing with smart meters, smart grid, Broadband, Wi-fi, satellites, etc. 5GHz now going to over 8GHz via WRC27. Enough is enough and start doing what is right! It may be your own lives you are saving. TRUST ME...losing my son from a cell-tower/cell-phone RF has destroyed my life and I've witnessed many others being harmed. This has to be covered by disabilities. I know people that are so disabled from being exposed that they pray to make it to another day. All of this has to be reigned in. The WEF-WB are not in charge! Sincerely, Virginia Farver

26110080082

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080082

26110080018

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080018

Wifi radiation is horrific. Memory performance worsening, ringing in ears, and poor sleep are my main concerns. The ringing in the ears wakes me up every night and sometimes it is so intense that I am unable to go back to sleep. Please do something about it.

26110080017

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080017

26110080007

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080007

26110080003 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110080003 I and others in my circle are very sensitive to EMFs and wireless radiation. We experience headaches, joint aches, cannot think/process clearly, dizziness - and I have read that some people have seizures when exposed to any amount of radiation. There are studies showing that cell phones emit more radiation than is allowed according to current FCC limits. This is multiplied in children, who have smaller bodies/brains (which are still developing). There are wi-fi towers EVERYWHERE, making it very difficult for those who suffer to participate for very long (or at all) in any public place, be it restaurants, libraries, public buildings, and even peoples' houses. Multiple studies show that we do NOT need 5G, as the current speed is sufficient for most needs, yet they keep making signals stronger and forcing us to use them. We are told that EVERYONE needs wi-fi in their homes, so in an apartment building you will have multiple full-strength signals on 24/7. Manufacturers make it difficult to turn routers on and off quickly. All of this radiation is impossible to get away from. EMF protective clothing is not enough. Most of us have ethernet in our homes because we are forced to have wi-fi/computers in order to do anything in life. Alternative measures such as ethernet or landlines are made so expensive that many cannot afford them. Manufacturers do not provide alternatives for sufferers like us. Many people have sued to get masts off of school buildings, as studies have shown higher rates of cancer in students attending those schools. Multiple studies show tumors or weakened bone structure directly under places where people place their phones next to their bodies. Multiple studies show lower sperm counts for men who insist on putting their phones in their pockets. It is outrageous that these studies are not being made public. We are not made aware of the dangers of keeping cell phones on and next to the body for ANY length of time. This is only stated in the VERY SMALL print in cell phone inserts, which are worded in legalese and so small that no one takes the time to read them. Manufacturers should be forced to…

Read the full comment →

26110079995

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079995

Giving up your phone for just 3 days can reshape your brain activity... It is bad enough to be in constant contact with a phone... But to have all this zapping going on through the air constantly... Selfish, greedy and apathetic to the rights of nature. It is a MORTAL (literally) sin to violate the laws of nature! Which is exactly what all this technology is doing... Sin Verguenza !!!

26110079991

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079991

26110079990

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079990

26110079974 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079974 Across the nation many residents are concerned about the small cell wireless antennas being deployed in our community. These powerful antennas, part of the next generation of wireless technology (5G), are being placed in close proximity to our homes, schools and other places where we engage in the activities of our daily lives, even though there is no science that assures their safety. This is an undeniable risk. The rapid rollout of the next generation in wireless communications known as “5G." In neighborhoods like ours across America, so-called “small cell” antennas need to be installed close to homes and apartments to facilitate this new technology. The deployment raises serious issues that should concern everyone in our community: safety, security, privacy, property values and health. The FCC’s human exposure guidelines for the radio frequency (RF) microwave radiation used for this technology are decades out of date and the agency has dismissed the results of decade-long research on RF microwave radiation and human health completed last year by the National Toxicology Program that showed “clear evidence of carcinogenicity.” Because the health and safety of our families is at stake, we demand a moratorium on further deployment of 5G until it can be proven safe. NOTE: This is a security and privacy issue. Wireless networks are relatively easy to hack compared to fiber-optic wired networks. Data from your phone and other wireless personal or home devices can be easily captured and marketed. In addition, small cell installations have the capacity to house cameras for facial recognition, as they do in China. What guarantees do we have that the technology will not be abused? This is a safety issue. Local zoning codes are meant to protect our safety, but the wireless industry is fighting those codes. Most existing utility poles (the preferred location for small cell antennas because it’s cheap) were not designed to withstand the hundreds of pounds of additional equipment, and severe weather events could bring down the poles, causing damage to our homes and property. Our local officials should have the right…

Read the full comment →

26110079941 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079941 I urge the FCC to take a careful, science-based look at the potential health effects of long-term exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation and to reconsider whether the current exposure limits are adequately protective. The FCC's existing limits date back to 1996, while wireless exposure has increased dramatically with cell phones, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, cell towers, and newer 5G technologies. Research has raised concerns about biological effects that are not adequately addressed by limits based primarily on thermal effects, including oxidative stress, DNA damage, reproductive effects, neurological effects, and effects on children. The scientific evidence deserves a thorough and independent review. Research has reported potential effects involving children's exposure, prenatal and developmental outcomes, oxidative stress, DNA damage, reproductive health, neurological function, long-term exposure, and wildlife. I ask the FCC to fully address this evidence, including potential effects from long-term and cumulative exposure and the particular vulnerability of children, before continuing to rely on exposure standards developed three decades ago. Public health protections should keep pace with the technology and the current scientific evidence. **References** 1. Gandhi, O. P., et al. (2012). *Exposure limits: The underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children.* Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 31(1), 34–51. doi:10.3109/15368378.2011.622827. 2. Fernández, C., et al. (2018). *Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye from cell phone conversation or virtual reality.* Environmental Research, 167, 694–699. 3. Aldad, T. S., Gan, G., Gao, X. B., & Taylor, H. S. (2012). *Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800–1900 MHz-rated cellular telephones affects neurodevelopment and behavior in mice.* Scientific Reports, 2, 312. doi:10.1038/srep00312. 4. Foerster, M., et al. (2018). *A prospective cohort study of adolescents' memory performance and individual brain dose of microwave radiation from wireless communication.* Environmental Health Perspectives,…

Read the full comment →

26110079939

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079939

I am an individual consumer with an AAT license in Arizona. Auricular Acupuncture Technician. I am confirming that I have felt and continue to feel the effects of the blanketed wireless transmission frequencies where I have lived, most evident and acute in Sedona, Arizona. Each year the following issues have become more pronounced and apparently chronic where I do what ever I can to remediate the effects. (This is an ongoing process) I also attended a EMF/ EMR class in Sedona for further education. Not only do we have the surrounding frequencies in WIFI situations but our homes wired traditionally also emit frequencies. Aggression Apprehension Tension Anxiety Depression Ear ringing Heart palpitations at times Cloudy or mental fog I am around wireless phones, Smart Meters on the house and Home WIFI systems that now do no longer offer wired only connections.

26110079921

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079921