All FCC comments · page 67

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Sensitivity & health experiences: 13-84 regulatory proceeding titled "Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radiofrequency (RF) Exposure Limits and Policies." I am responding from several perspectives: as a software engineer with extensive experience working with technology and electronic systems; as a person who has experienced significant symptoms that I associate with exposure to electromagnetic fields and wireless radiation; and as a professional who has spent the past several years measuring and documenting electromagnetic field exposures in my home and other environments.
• Sleep & neurological concerns: I also believe that federal research priorities should include long-term, independent investigation of cumulative and chronic exposure, children and pregnancy, reproductive and developmental outcomes, neurological and sleep-related effects, cardiovascular and other biological effects, environmental and ecological effects, and exposure associated with evolving technologies such as 5G, future wireless systems, IoT devices, wearables, smart homes, wireless medical devices, and increasingly dense wireless infrastructure.
• Cancer & tumors: The National Toxicology Program conducted extensive, government-sponsored toxicology and carcinogenicity studies using whole-body exposure to 900 MHz GSM- and CDMA-modulated radiofrequency radiation.
• Children, schools & development: the type, number, frequencies and transmission characteristics of a device; how to reduce unnecessary close-proximity exposure; how to use wired alternatives where available; how to disable wireless functions completely; whether a device continues transmitting while in standby or charging; whether simultaneous transmitters were evaluated; whether children or other populations were specifically evaluated; and what exposure conditions were and were not included in testing.
• Pregnancy & reproduction: I am particularly concerned about exposure involving children, infants, pregnancy, and other populations that may differ from those of a typical adult.
• Biological mechanisms & metabolism: found that 50 minutes of cellular-phone RF exposure was associated with increased glucose metabolism in brain regions closest to the phone antenna.
• Towers, antennas & siting: I also believe that federal research priorities should include long-term, independent investigation of cumulative and chronic exposure, children and pregnancy, reproductive and developmental outcomes, neurological and sleep-related effects, cardiovascular and other biological effects, environmental and ecological effects, and exposure associated with evolving technologies such as 5G, future wireless systems, IoT devices, wearables, smart homes, wireless medical devices, and increasingly dense wireless infrastructure.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I don’t want to feel these symptoms anymore when doing normal things like working in an office, walking into a store with an overpowered mesh / wifi system, going to a concert, restaurant, bar, or visiting family or friends.
• Wired connections & alternatives: Cellular phones should support calls and text messaging when the phone is connected through a wired Ethernet connection to a router, so that consumers who choose a wired network connection can use their phones for these functions without requiring an active wireless connection.
• Wildlife & environment: In January of 2022 I eliminated wireless technologies completely from my personal environment and whenever feasible reduced or distanced myself from electric and magnetic emissions.
• Exposure limits & testing: 13-84 regulatory proceeding titled "Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radiofrequency (RF) Exposure Limits and Policies." I am responding from several perspectives: as a software engineer with extensive experience working with technology and electronic systems; as a person who has experienced significant symptoms that I associate with exposure to electromagnetic fields and wireless radiation; and as a professional who has spent the past several years measuring and documenting electromagnetic field exposures in my home and other environments.
• Court remand & agency accountability: Morgan et al., Why children absorb more microwave radiation than adults: The consequences These studies are particularly relevant to the FCC's remand questions concerning children because a standard based on a reference adult or a generalized SAR measurement may not necessarily characterize exposure for all body sizes, ages, anatomical structures, or use conditions.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: Technology will continue to develop faster than long-term health research and regulatory processes can reasonably keep pace with it.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• E-Rate & school connectivity: https://youtu.be/8JkcYM6YsBE?si=Ev6DooUTJLSwtASt As noted by the International Association of Firefighters IAFF: The FCC authorizes and licenses products, transmitters, and facilities that generate RF and microwave radiation.
• Sensitivity & health experiences: similar health effects as the ones who are intentionally being targeted for experimentation declared legal for purposes other than warfare, are the same or similar symptoms being reported by those who are having various health effects simply from chronic daily exposure to wireless devices without this being necessarily weaponized against them in any way.
• Sleep & neurological concerns: In this new neurotechnological age, which is characterized by a growing geopolitical neurobiological and Artificial Intelligence (AI) arms race (NSI, 2017a: 20), traditional concepts of war, security and peace are increasingly replaced by terms such as ‘cognitive warfare’ (NATO, 2021), ‘neurodeterrence’ (NSI, 2012: 50), and digital biosecurity” (Giordano and DiEuliis, 2021: 22).
• Cancer & tumors: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old insufficient radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer and should include known effects of non ionizing radiation from thousands of publications found in early research studies.
• Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Towers, antennas & siting: In 1996, the FCC revised its guidelines for RF/MW radiation exposure as a result of a multi-year proceeding and as required by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (https://www.iaff.org/cell-tower-radiation/).
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old insufficient radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer and should include known effects of non ionizing radiation from thousands of publications found in early research studies.
• Court remand & agency accountability: In this new neurotechnological age, which is characterized by a growing geopolitical neurobiological and Artificial Intelligence (AI) arms race (NSI, 2017a: 20), traditional concepts of war, security and peace are increasingly replaced by terms such as ‘cognitive warfare’ (NATO, 2021), ‘neurodeterrence’ (NSI, 2012: 50), and digital biosecurity” (Giordano and DiEuliis, 2021: 22).
• Research, evidence & monitoring: The Peace Research Institute of Oslo, PRIO, provides in an article titled: Imagining War in the Neurotechnological Age: ‘We are entering a world, where technologies no longer simply threaten our bodies.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Children, schools & development: Revisions to this act should include regular review of RF exposure standards, research, protection of sensitive locations such as schools, expand environmental review, increase transparency, and allow local governments and their constituents to have more decision-making power over wireless facility placement.
• Towers, antennas & siting: The FCC states, "The available scientific evidence does not show that any health problems are associated with using wireless phones." Further, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 restricts state and local governments from regulating wireless infrastructures (like cell towers) based on health or environment effects of radio frequency emission.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: The FCC states, "The available scientific evidence does not show that any health problems are associated with using wireless phones." Further, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 restricts state and local governments from regulating wireless infrastructures (like cell towers) based on health or environment effects of radio frequency emission.
• Wildlife & environment: The FCC states, "The available scientific evidence does not show that any health problems are associated with using wireless phones." Further, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 restricts state and local governments from regulating wireless infrastructures (like cell towers) based on health or environment effects of radio frequency emission.
• Exposure limits & testing: Revisions to this act should include regular review of RF exposure standards, research, protection of sensitive locations such as schools, expand environmental review, increase transparency, and allow local governments and their constituents to have more decision-making power over wireless facility placement.
• Court remand & agency accountability: The FCC states, "The available scientific evidence does not show that any health problems are associated with using wireless phones." Further, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 restricts state and local governments from regulating wireless infrastructures (like cell towers) based on health or environment effects of radio frequency emission.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: The FCC states, "The available scientific evidence does not show that any health problems are associated with using wireless phones." Further, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 restricts state and local governments from regulating wireless infrastructures (like cell towers) based on health or environment effects of radio frequency emission.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.