All FCC comments · page 61

2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.

#1201My wife suffers severe brain fog and headaches whenever we go into town. We deal with a few businesses lo…by James Buchanan » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081961

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081961

My wife suffers severe brain fog and headaches whenever we go into town. We deal with a few businesses located proximate to a 5G tower and it ALWAYS affects her. When we only need to go to the other end of town, she fares much better. The public desperately needs industry and health agencies to reassess EMF exposure effects and focus on safeguards and changes necessary to ensure healthier outcomes.

#1202Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081960

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081960

Official documents · 4

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1203Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081959

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081959

Official documents · 4

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1204I live within 100 meters of a cell tower in downtown Kalamazoo rand despite all attempts at stopping the …by Ladislav Hanka » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections
  • Towers, antennas & siting: I live within 100 meters of a cell tower in downtown Kalamazoo rand despite all attempts at stopping the installation of those massive towers in a residential area, was not allowed to even testify and be heard.
  • Wildlife & environment: I noticed this most when we had a breakdown of the power grid in Kalamazoo after a windstorm took down many large trees, transformers and power-lines in my area of the city.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081957

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081957

I live within 100 meters of a cell tower in downtown Kalamazoo rand despite all attempts at stopping the installation of those massive towers in a residential area, was not allowed to even testify and be heard. I have no choice in that continual exposure or even a right to have those well-documented health concerns taken into consideration which are clearly real. I noticed this most when we had a breakdown of the power grid in Kalamazoo after a windstorm took down many large trees, transformers and power-lines in my area of the city. For several days everything was dark after sunset. The point I wish to make is that I suddenly slept better and the subtle degrees of continual stress that are everyday life in a city fell blessedly away revealing what we live with. Gone were the arguments among people and nervous states about small things that continually disturb us and we hardly know about. As a lifelong meditator I am trained to recognize such changes of states of mind and they are real. We should not have to live with this. What we have is the opposite of informed consent.

#1205When exposed to wireless radiation I can feel: umbalanced, headache, nausea, dizziness, numbness, muscle …by Maria Howard » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: When exposed to wireless radiation I can feel: umbalanced, headache, nausea, dizziness, numbness, muscle spams, palpitation, and itchy skin.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Nonetheless the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: As an example among many please see https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118300367?via%3Dihub I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081956

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081956

When exposed to wireless radiation I can feel: umbalanced, headache, nausea, dizziness, numbness, muscle spams, palpitation, and itchy skin. The itchiness can change into feeling skin burning, like it is being pierced by hot sharp needles . Extended exposure to wireless can bring exhaustion and heart palpitation. I am very concerned about the effects of widespread wireless people and nature exposure to this man made non native wireless radiation. As an example among many please see https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118300367?via%3Dihub I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Nonetheless the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court.

#1206To whom it may concern: I have recurrent corneal tears. I recently bought a 17E iPhone. This phone very n…by Karen Lummus » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081955

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081955

To whom it may concern: I have recurrent corneal tears. I recently bought a 17E iPhone. This phone very notably affects my eyes, especially the left eye, and even more especially when I am incapacitated with a debilitating, painful tear. The closer the phone gets to me, the more physical grief I feel in my eye, which then affects the other eye and the rest of my body. It’s a very real thing. I also get regular headaches and eye discomfort with normal use of my phone. I needed a new phone, but the 5G is seriously detrimental. This harmful energy must stop, especially around schools and homes. Sincerely, Karen Lummus.

#1207I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Elizabeth Perez » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081954

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081954

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. Please protect the health and wellbeing of our children.

#1208The evidence of harm from wireless radiation has now grown massive. It has become the undeniable elephant…by Mark Brody » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: In my own practice as a physician I have seen countless patients who reported a variety of illness symptoms when exposed to wireless radiation.
  • Children, schools & development: I urge you to not repeat the mistakes of COVID, where young people were exposed to the vaccine because reckless and irresponsible regulators were misled in approving the COVID vaccine for children by nonsensical guidelines like, “We’ll never know how harmful it is unless we approve it.” In no universe aligned with ethical principles can this guidance possibly be acceptable.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Ignoring this research is completely irresponsible.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Debra Davis, Magda Havas, Arthur Firstenberg, Martin Pall, Martin Blank, and Joel Moskowitz are just some of the researchers have extensively documented the harms of this technology and the thousands of research studies attesting to its harmfulness.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081952

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081952

The evidence of harm from wireless radiation has now grown massive. It has become the undeniable elephant in the room. In my own practice as a physician I have seen countless patients who reported a variety of illness symptoms when exposed to wireless radiation. Debra Davis, Magda Havas, Arthur Firstenberg, Martin Pall, Martin Blank, and Joel Moskowitz are just some of the researchers have extensively documented the harms of this technology and the thousands of research studies attesting to its harmfulness. Ignoring this research is completely irresponsible. Even if one disagrees with the research, or questions the methodology the LEAST a responsible regulator could do is to stop the spread of this technology until regulators have determined that the technology is WITHOUT QUESTION safe for human exposure. We are certainly a long way away from that conclusion, which is basic to the precautionary principle - and which should serve as guidance for all regulators. Please STOP the expansion of this technology, roll back its most dangerous applications, and insist on higher standards if you have any sense of right and wrong in your hearts. There is simply NO JUSTIFICATION for maintaining or expanding a technology which has so many already demonstrated harms, and many which are simply not properly researched. I urge you to not repeat the mistakes of COVID, where young people were exposed to the vaccine because reckless and irresponsible regulators were misled in approving the COVID vaccine for children by nonsensical guidelines like, “We’ll never know how harmful it is unless we approve it.” In no universe aligned with ethical principles can this guidance possibly be acceptable. Do your duty, and regulate dangerous technology as it ought to be regulated.

#1209Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxid…by Lynn Weed » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage Since exposures -- I have suffered migraine headaches, temporal arteritis, inflammation, and other maladies, which a reasonable person would believe, have causative factors, based on overexposure to the electromagnetic activity emitted near me, by cell phone and other em devices.
  • Biological mechanisms & metabolism: Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage Since exposures -- I have suffered migraine headaches, temporal arteritis, inflammation, and other maladies, which a reasonable person would believe, have causative factors, based on overexposure to the electromagnetic activity emitted near me, by cell phone and other em devices.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage Since exposures -- I have suffered migraine headaches, temporal arteritis, inflammation, and other maladies, which a reasonable person would believe, have causative factors, based on overexposure to the electromagnetic activity emitted near me, by cell phone and other em devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081951

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081951

Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage Since exposures -- I have suffered migraine headaches, temporal arteritis, inflammation, and other maladies, which a reasonable person would believe, have causative factors, based on overexposure to the electromagnetic activity emitted near me, by cell phone and other em devices. Lynn Weed, New York 10002

#1210Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081950

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081950

Official documents · 4

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1211Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081948

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081948

Official documents · 3

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1212I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Maureen Durette » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: There is a specific symptomatology linked to radar and RF exposure at low levels, characterized by functional disturbances of the central nervous system (headache, sleep disturbance, discomfort, irritability, depression, memory loss, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, appetite loss, difficulty in concentration, dizziness, etc.), that has been termed ‘RF sickness’ (Lilienfeld et al., 1978; Johnson Lyakouris, 1998; Navarro et al., 2003).
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: There is a specific symptomatology linked to radar and RF exposure at low levels, characterized by functional disturbances of the central nervous system (headache, sleep disturbance, discomfort, irritability, depression, memory loss, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, appetite loss, difficulty in concentration, dizziness, etc.), that has been termed ‘RF sickness’ (Lilienfeld et al., 1978; Johnson Lyakouris, 1998; Navarro et al., 2003).
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: Below are sited studies from source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935122011781 These studies found increases in cancer and other health problems in humans living around antennas (e.g.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081947 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081947 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. Below are sited studies from source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935122011781 These studies found increases in cancer and other health problems in humans living around antennas (e.g. Santini et al., 2002; Navarro et al., 2003; Bortkiewicz et al., 2004; Eger et al., 2004; Wolf and Wolf, 2004; Abdel-Rassoul et al., 2007; Khurana et al., 2010; Dode et al., 2011; Shinjyo and Shinjyo, 2014; Gandhi et al., 2015; López et al., 2021; Rodrigues et al., 2021). There is a specific symptomatology linked to radar and RF exposure at low levels, characterized by functional disturbances of the central nervous system (headache, sleep disturbance, discomfort, irritability, depression, memory loss, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, appetite loss, difficulty in concentration, dizziness, etc.), that has been termed ‘RF sickness’ (Lilienfeld et al., 1978; Johnson Lyakouris, 1998; Navarro et al., 2003). "In the current circumstances, it seems that the scientific experts in the field are very clear about the serious problems we are facing and have expressed this through important appeals (Blank et al., 2015; Hardell and Nyberg, 2020). However, the media, the…

Read the full comment →

#1213Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081946

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081946

Official documents · 4

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1214I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Jason Thomas » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: My family experience with wireless radiation when sleeping, as our ears significantly ringing and experience insomnia and heart palpitations until we remove the cell phones and shut off the home wireless router, it helps but not all the time, this has gotten worse since the install of the "smart" meters on our house.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: My family experience with wireless radiation when sleeping, as our ears significantly ringing and experience insomnia and heart palpitations until we remove the cell phones and shut off the home wireless router, it helps but not all the time, this has gotten worse since the install of the "smart" meters on our house.
  • Biological mechanisms & metabolism: (2021): Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage – Reviewed evidence and proposed mechanisms linking human-made electromagnetic fields to oxidative stress, DNA damage, and cellular dysfunction.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: My family experience with wireless radiation when sleeping, as our ears significantly ringing and experience insomnia and heart palpitations until we remove the cell phones and shut off the home wireless router, it helps but not all the time, this has gotten worse since the install of the "smart" meters on our house.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Here is just one study I believe the FCC should review when addressing the concerns about wireless radiation: Panagopoulos et al.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081945

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081945

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. Here is just one study I believe the FCC should review when addressing the concerns about wireless radiation: Panagopoulos et al. (2021): Human-made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced-oscillation and voltage-gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage – Reviewed evidence and proposed mechanisms linking human-made electromagnetic fields to oxidative stress, DNA damage, and cellular dysfunction. My family experience with wireless radiation when sleeping, as our ears significantly ringing and experience insomnia and heart palpitations until we remove the cell phones and shut off the home wireless router, it helps but not all the time, this has gotten worse since the install of the "smart" meters on our house. I believe over time we are being negatively impacted by wireless radiation. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court. Thank you! J Thomas

#1215It is a nightmare living near a 5g tower. I can't sleep, have headaches every day. Sometimes I feel dizzy…by Renee Rosignoli » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081944

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081944

It is a nightmare living near a 5g tower. I can't sleep, have headaches every day. Sometimes I feel dizzy. In Portugal and Italy, 5g towers are banned from being placed near homes and schools. Why are you guys doing this? If people don't get enough sleep, they won't have the energy to get much done.

#1216In my reading of the FCC rules regarding 5G towers, they are allowed to be placed anywhere -- next to sch…by Kenneth MacLean » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections
  • Children, schools & development: In my reading of the FCC rules regarding 5G towers, they are allowed to be placed anywhere -- next to schools, daycare centers, hospitals, and in the middle of residential neighborhoods.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: In my reading of the FCC rules regarding 5G towers, they are allowed to be placed anywhere -- next to schools, daycare centers, hospitals, and in the middle of residential neighborhoods.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Surely an investigation into the radiation given off by these towers needs to be conducted to determine the long-term effects on human biology.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081943

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081943

In my reading of the FCC rules regarding 5G towers, they are allowed to be placed anywhere -- next to schools, daycare centers, hospitals, and in the middle of residential neighborhoods. Surely an investigation into the radiation given off by these towers needs to be conducted to determine the long-term effects on human biology. I have seen 5G mini-towers on top of water towers! Please reconsider these FCC rules regarding 5G (or 6G) towers and ban them from neighborhoods and other senstive populated areas. Allow states to determine the placement of these towers, NOT telecommunication companies interested only in their balance sheets, or a federal bureaucracy.

#1217Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081942

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081942

Official documents · 4

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1218I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by michael thomas BROWN » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: This issue matters to me personally because: it causes insomnia.
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081941

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081941

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. Here is just one study I believe the FCC should review when addressing the concerns about wireless radiation: [Please paste the study you’ve chosen to include here.] The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: it causes insomnia. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#1219I am a medical doctor trained in environmental medicine and family medicine. In the past 20 years I have …by Erica M Elliott » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081940

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081940

I am a medical doctor trained in environmental medicine and family medicine. In the past 20 years I have seen a growing number of patients who suffer from EMF poisoning. This can manifest in many ways, such as cardiac arrhythmias, severe anxiety, severe insomnia, exhaustion, "brain fog,"cognitive decline, and more. The problem is affecting a growing number of people, including children.

#1220I measure RF on sidewalks surrounding schools in Fairhope & Silverhill & a local city ballpark.Both consi…by Van Elias » 2026-10-16
AI summary & topic connections
  • Children, schools & development: I measure RF on sidewalks surrounding schools in Fairhope & Silverhill & a local city ballpark.Both consistently register 50-100 times Over current RF safe limit that is from 1996 .

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110081939

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110081939

I measure RF on sidewalks surrounding schools in Fairhope & Silverhill & a local city ballpark.Both consistently register 50-100 times Over current RF safe limit that is from 1996 . This is criminal. Using Tri Field meter