All FCC comments · page 119

2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.

#2361I am writing with utmost concern about the FCC's handling of wireless radiation and the significant negat…by Cynthia Gough James » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077120

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077120

I am writing with utmost concern about the FCC's handling of wireless radiation and the significant negative health effects the ever growing radiation is creating for me, my family and everyone. It is the biggest issue I am concerned about as an american citizen right now. I am specifically writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. I get terrible headaches when I am in the near proximity of cell towers. In high rises, with multiple wifi, I feel agitation in my body and have trouble sleeping. When I am driving on highways that are increasingly being peppered with towers of all EMF type, I have been feeling wired and physically tired after a short period of time. Until I got an emf blocking cell phone case, my hand holding my cell phone would feel physically zapped after a few minutes of use. I am watching the rapid nervous systems, physical health and emotional well-being decline in our population and it is of utmost concern to me that IMMEDIATE PROTECTIVE ACTION and actual broad scale research be done on the effect of this technology. The FCC is NOT A HEALTH AGENCY! It does NOT have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This is the single greatest threat to life in our country and world. Please dig deep within your hearts, minds and souls, and act with URGENT PROTECTIVE AND PREVENTATIVE MEASURES & WORK IN CONCERT WITH HHS AND OTHER HEALTH AGENCIES!

#2362I've suffered greatly from EMF Hyper-sensitivity for over 10 years. I'm unable to work, have multiple hea…by Michelle Lock » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077119

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077119

I've suffered greatly from EMF Hyper-sensitivity for over 10 years. I'm unable to work, have multiple health problems, and difficulties with sleep. The excessive wifi from condos that surround me is a factor, but I can't afford to move. My social life is limited because people don't like putting their phones on airplane mode.

#2363Around the year 2000 I realized something was very wrong because I was having double vision, so I saw a d…by Jonathon A. Landell » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • E-Rate & school connectivity: The cause of this growth was a portable battery operated telephone extension which I wore on my head every day for about a year until this happened.
  • Children, schools & development: We now know that is not true, but the FCC continues to hold this antique determination and install towers over homes and schools where ever the industry wants, STOP THIS RIGHT NOW PLEASE!
  • Towers, antennas & siting: We now know that is not true, but the FCC continues to hold this antique determination and install towers over homes and schools where ever the industry wants, STOP THIS RIGHT NOW PLEASE!

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077118

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077118

Around the year 2000 I realized something was very wrong because I was having double vision, so I saw a doctor who found that I had a SHWARNOMA benign growth on my 4th Cranial nerve. I had to go through a 12 hour operation at Mass General Hospital, which removed enough of this leason that it stopped growing, but my double vision will continue for the rest of my life. The cause of this growth was a portable battery operated telephone extension which I wore on my head every day for about a year until this happened. There was a sign on the box that said the thing was tested by the FCC and found to be SAFE! That was a serious LIE, but I know the FCC hasn't acknowledged the possibility of physical harm unless the radiation causes HEAT! We now know that is not true, but the FCC continues to hold this antique determination and install towers over homes and schools where ever the industry wants, STOP THIS RIGHT NOW PLEASE! It's still killing innocent people!

#2364I lived in Oregon before I moved to North Carolina. I operated a salon in Eugene Oregon for over 18 years…by Tia Seran » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077117

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077117

I lived in Oregon before I moved to North Carolina. I operated a salon in Eugene Oregon for over 18 years. I started experiencing headaches, dizzy spells and waves of nausea. I realized it only happened at work even though I had worked there for years. I researched more and found out the same time my symptoms started coincided exactly with the numerous 5G towers that had been installed around my work space. I was forced to cut back to part time and limit the amount of time I spent in the salon I had built a my life around. I ended up selling the business completely and relocating and had to hunt hard to find a home and work place far enough away from any towers. Please evaluate the safety of this radiation we are all being exposed to. For those that suffer from sensitivities to it the symptom's can be debilitating. Sincerely -Tia Seran

#2365It's all ready bad enough that people run their WIFI day and night and don't have knowledge enough to tur…by Mark » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: I've had to make physical changes to my living area where i sleep and live to protect me from cell phone towers plus the random wifi of others ..
  • Children, schools & development: It's all ready bad enough that people run their WIFI day and night and don't have knowledge enough to turn those darn things off when they go to bed or to limit children's time being near it ..
  • Towers, antennas & siting: But when the public at large have cell phone towers near them they have no choice but to endure the exposure ..
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: It's all ready bad enough that people run their WIFI day and night and don't have knowledge enough to turn those darn things off when they go to bed or to limit children's time being near it ..

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077116

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077116

It's all ready bad enough that people run their WIFI day and night and don't have knowledge enough to turn those darn things off when they go to bed or to limit children's time being near it .. But when the public at large have cell phone towers near them they have no choice but to endure the exposure .. There are times i've gone to bed and had insured all my wifi's were indeed turned off but i still had humming plus the vibration of the humming from these cell towers ringing in my head .. I've had to make physical changes to my living area where i sleep and live to protect me from cell phone towers plus the random wifi of others .. No one paid me to make those changes and no one should force to me to have to make them either by leaving me no choice .. I know people who have developed radiation poisoning and they don't have a clue as to where they could have gotten it when i ask if cell phone towers are near them they say yes .. Saying that cell phone towers are paid for but no one is footing the health cost that comes along with them ..

#2366I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Stephen J DeFino » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077113

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077113

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2367CERTIFICATE OF IDENTIFICATION ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE that is “covid-19” it’s an inorganic alien parasite…by Tanya McGowan » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • E-Rate & school connectivity: We are watching a movie and Trump and JFK Jr., the White Hats and the BRICS Alliance and Space Force and Elon Musk’s Starlink have offworld multidimensional assistance to expose and evict the darkness and liberate Humanity during this Ascension Great Awakening..?
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: CERTIFICATE OF IDENTIFICATION ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE that is “covid-19” it’s an inorganic alien parasite artificial intelligence frequency using 5G (5th generation) cellphone towers …if you sleep with your “Smart” cell phone (an alien weapon actually) on your body you will wake up sick, coughing (nanotech fembots lodged in your lungs 🫁) bronchitis inflammation of your lungs 🫁 or heart ❤️ (myocarditis- inflammation of your heart).
  • Children, schools & development: The Lockdowns during Operation Warpspeed were to keep the civilians safe while the D.U.M.B.s were being cleaned out of the child sex trafficking, adrenochrome labs and the satanic antihuman death culture creatures’ genetic chimera labs…?
  • Towers, antennas & siting: CERTIFICATE OF IDENTIFICATION ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE that is “covid-19” it’s an inorganic alien parasite artificial intelligence frequency using 5G (5th generation) cellphone towers …if you sleep with your “Smart” cell phone (an alien weapon actually) on your body you will wake up sick, coughing (nanotech fembots lodged in your lungs 🫁) bronchitis inflammation of your lungs 🫁 or heart ❤️ (myocarditis- inflammation of your heart).
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: CERTIFICATE OF IDENTIFICATION ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE that is “covid-19” it’s an inorganic alien parasite artificial intelligence frequency using 5G (5th generation) cellphone towers …if you sleep with your “Smart” cell phone (an alien weapon actually) on your body you will wake up sick, coughing (nanotech fembots lodged in your lungs 🫁) bronchitis inflammation of your lungs 🫁 or heart ❤️ (myocarditis- inflammation of your heart).

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077112

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077112

CERTIFICATE OF IDENTIFICATION ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE that is “covid-19” it’s an inorganic alien parasite artificial intelligence frequency using 5G (5th generation) cellphone towers …if you sleep with your “Smart” cell phone (an alien weapon actually) on your body you will wake up sick, coughing (nanotech fembots lodged in your lungs 🫁) bronchitis inflammation of your lungs 🫁 or heart ❤️ (myocarditis- inflammation of your heart). We all have nanotechnology “smart dust” in our bodies (chemtrails, GMOs,vaccines)… what CURES this negative alien A.I. virus? Ivermectin an antiparasite which is only fermented oyster mushrooms… (fermented kombucha, fermented kefir is prebiotics and probiotics that builds your good bacteria army in your amazing body)! What if… 1. COVID 19 (Certificate of Identification Artificial Intelligence) was a psyop to expose the dangers of 5G already mitigated by 45’s COVFEFE, and the Deep State’s Transhumanism agenda to enslave Humanity (Cloudmind Cancelled)..? 2. The “Vaccine”, mostly saline, was a psyop to expose corrupt CDC, WHO, WEF, Big Pharma and promote natural health and God immunity…?  3. The Lockdowns during Operation Warpspeed were to keep the civilians safe while the D.U.M.B.s were being cleaned out of the child sex trafficking, adrenochrome labs and the satanic antihuman death culture creatures’ genetic chimera labs…? 4. We are watching a movie and Trump and JFK Jr., the White Hats and the BRICS Alliance and Space Force and Elon Musk’s Starlink have offworld multidimensional assistance to expose and evict the darkness and liberate Humanity during this Ascension Great Awakening..?  5. Operation Warpspeed was to speed up the Deep State Dark Cult’s evil Agenda 2030 shadow plans to disclose to We The People the TRUTH THAT SETS US FREE..?  6. Where We Go One We Go All.  7.Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming.  8.TRUST THE PLAN. 9.GOD WINS.  10.The Best Is Yet To Come. 11.Changing of the Old Guard. 12.Dawn of the Golden Age of Humanity. 13. Devolution, ReConstitution, Restored Republic. 14. Slow drip of truth disclosure then FLOOD. 15. It had to be this way.  16. We the People Had to Be Shown. 17. Thanks for reading.  www.goodlion.tv  “The Greatest Show On Earth” 😊🙏🇺🇸🌎🍿🎥

#2368I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Arvo Zylo » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077111

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077111

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2369My sensitivity to EMFs began with an attempt to upgrade my cell phone to a Iphone 3G in 2009. Immediate s…by Kathy Webster » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077110

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077110

My sensitivity to EMFs began with an attempt to upgrade my cell phone to a Iphone 3G in 2009. Immediate symptoms included neck stiffness, inability to turn my head, head burning and tinnitus. These issues progressed to include some loss of vision in one eye, intermittent active eye floaters and gut issues. I quickly returned the phone and stayed with 2G non-smart phones until they were no longer useable. I have now had an Iphone 7plus for a number of years and use 4G cell data only, no wifi. I think this is because there does not appear to be a constant "checking" signal with cell data. I am unable to have wifi in my home or office due to my symptoms. I still have all the same problems, some not an regularly; however, I still have head (nerve?) burning and ear ringing at different sounds and decibel levels constantly. I also have gut issues regularly. I do not want to upgrade to a 5G phone but am realizing I can use less and less of the required apps to conduct business functions. I will add I was an extremely healthy person prior to this disaster.

#2370Please study the effects of technology on humans. Data centers, cell towers, wifi, cell phones, and all o…by Jennifer Muccianti » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077109

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077109

Please study the effects of technology on humans. Data centers, cell towers, wifi, cell phones, and all other recent technologies. People are reporting illness, cancers, migraines, and more, yet nothing is being done. Please do something.

#2371Attachment-only filingby Michael Berlin » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077108

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077108

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#2372I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Courtney Harris » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: I can see the tower from my front yard and my family and I have experienced frequent headaches, brain fog and sleep disturbances.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: I can see the tower from my front yard and my family and I have experienced frequent headaches, brain fog and sleep disturbances.
  • Cancer & tumors: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
  • Children, schools & development: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: This issue matters to me personally because my family and I live 50 yards from a large 5G tower that hovers above a track and field and a playground.
  • Wildlife & environment: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077107

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077107

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because my family and I live 50 yards from a large 5G tower that hovers above a track and field and a playground. I can see the tower from my front yard and my family and I have experienced frequent headaches, brain fog and sleep disturbances. There are two children in our area who have been diagnosed with leukemia and it is difficult to not assume the 5G tower could have had some impact. We live in a densely populated neighborhood where many families are impacted by the use of this large tower. In addition to the tower, AT&T and Verizon have placed at least Four 5G "boosters" within a 100 yard radius of my home. They are in our alleyways and along our sidewalks. My Broadband RF meter detects levels far above "safe" at extreme levels (87,000 µW/m²). My children are exposed to this around the clock while at home. Would you feel comfortable with your family in this environment?

#2373I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Mark Busch » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: This issue matters to me personally because I live by a large cell phone tower that is emitting radiation.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077106 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077106 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because I live by a large cell phone tower that is emitting radiation. I have read the book "The Invisible Rainbow" by Arthur Firstenberg, which gives a very strong case that EMF exposures can cause serious health effect. I have also read the book "The Body Electric" by Robert Becker, a scientist who studied the impact of EMF on biological systems and health. It is very difficult for a person like me to have the resources to prove that health issues are caused by EMFs. But it should be the responsibility of the government to make sure that environmental effects are not introduced which are dangerous to human…

Read the full comment →

#2374I am chronically ill for years now and cannot heal in the environment most of us live in, with cell tower…by Hilary H Huntington » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Towers, antennas & siting: I am chronically ill for years now and cannot heal in the environment most of us live in, with cell towers in every direction.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: After 8 mos of agony, I had to travel to rural Mexico where they block wifi signals at the clinic I chose and finally started to repair my tendon in a month's time.
  • Wildlife & environment: I am chronically ill for years now and cannot heal in the environment most of us live in, with cell towers in every direction.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: In fact, I have come to believe through exhaustive research that this life altering radiation is intentional.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077105

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077105

I am chronically ill for years now and cannot heal in the environment most of us live in, with cell towers in every direction. I recently had an Achilles Heel Rupture to add to the long list of diseases and bc I live in a Condo, I am bombarded by this god forsaken Radiation from every apt and towers for miles around me. After 8 mos of agony, I had to travel to rural Mexico where they block wifi signals at the clinic I chose and finally started to repair my tendon in a month's time. This exposure is killing people including me. Stop this madness now! There are alot of us suffering and you know perfectly well that you are harming us. In fact, I have come to believe through exhaustive research that this life altering radiation is intentional.

#2375I am very affected by Electro-magnetic Freqencies (EMFs). One of the first things I noticed was using Fac…by Lori, Lori Deutsch » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077103

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077103

I am very affected by Electro-magnetic Freqencies (EMFs). One of the first things I noticed was using Facetime on my I-phone. The first time I did it, it burned my face. I got off quickly. I tried one other time and had the same experience. I've never done Facetime after that. When I use my I-phone, I put it on speaker, at least an arm's length away. We also pull out the router every night to shut-down the WiFi when we are sleeping. We've been doing this for many years, and I'm sure, as a person sensitive to EMFs, this has helped me health-wise. I have met people who are very sick from wireless radiation.

#2376I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Mrs Denice Norris » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: This issue matters to me personally because: During 2021 when 5G was introduced to my neighborhood, I developed tinnitus, vertigo, and was unable to sleep in my bedroom secondary to headaches.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: This issue matters to me personally because: During 2021 when 5G was introduced to my neighborhood, I developed tinnitus, vertigo, and was unable to sleep in my bedroom secondary to headaches.
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: This issue matters to me personally because: During 2021 when 5G was introduced to my neighborhood, I developed tinnitus, vertigo, and was unable to sleep in my bedroom secondary to headaches.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077102 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077102 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: During 2021 when 5G was introduced to my neighborhood, I developed tinnitus, vertigo, and was unable to sleep in my bedroom secondary to headaches. I discovered, by using an EMF meter, that some of my issues were due to the Smart meter that had been placed on our home, outside, electrical meter. Once this was removed, I was able to sleep in my bedroom but I still experience the tinnitus especially in some parts of my home. However, when I am outside walking at the park, the tinnitus is almost totally resolved as I am away from the home wifi. I have also noticed that flies die very shortly after entering…

Read the full comment →

#2377I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Nick Morale » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077101

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077101

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue is important to me because the researchers I trust who don't have financial ties to the cell phone industry are showing a strong correlation between cell phone radiation exposure and cancer, as well as to nervous system disruption. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2378The risks of EMF radiation hasn’t been studied in decades. I know for a fact my family and I have more he…by Andria Meeder » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: When I remove us from as much of it I can for an extended period of time our symptoms Always go away, but return once we are back living in this high field of radiation all around us in the city , schools, hospitals, doctors, everywhere.
  • Children, schools & development: When I remove us from as much of it I can for an extended period of time our symptoms Always go away, but return once we are back living in this high field of radiation all around us in the city , schools, hospitals, doctors, everywhere.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I know for a fact my family and I have more health issues as a result of Wi-Fi radiation.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: The risks of EMF radiation hasn’t been studied in decades.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077099

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077099

The risks of EMF radiation hasn’t been studied in decades. I know for a fact my family and I have more health issues as a result of Wi-Fi radiation. When I remove us from as much of it I can for an extended period of time our symptoms Always go away, but return once we are back living in this high field of radiation all around us in the city , schools, hospitals, doctors, everywhere. If you aren’t concerned for the American people, as it’s obvious you’re not, think of your children and their children. Only GOD, the great I AM can get us out of this mess man has created

#2379Wireless radiation causes me to have screaming tinnitus every minute of the day and therefore I never get…by Jayme Lewis » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: Wireless radiation causes me to have screaming tinnitus every minute of the day and therefore I never get any quality sleep, due to it both keeps me awake and wakes me up if I'm asleep.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: Wireless radiation causes me to have screaming tinnitus every minute of the day and therefore I never get any quality sleep, due to it both keeps me awake and wakes me up if I'm asleep.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077098

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077098

Wireless radiation causes me to have screaming tinnitus every minute of the day and therefore I never get any quality sleep, due to it both keeps me awake and wakes me up if I'm asleep.

#2380I am very concerned, stressed, and worried about the abundant and rapid roll out of antennas, cell towers…by Michael Morningstar » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: Many people are showing symptoms of Electro Magnetic Hypersensitivity (EMS) and wireless exposure.
  • Children, schools & development: I am very concerned, stressed, and worried about the abundant and rapid roll out of antennas, cell towers, 5G, and wi-fi routers in so many public places and schools.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: I am very concerned, stressed, and worried about the abundant and rapid roll out of antennas, cell towers, 5G, and wi-fi routers in so many public places and schools.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I am very concerned, stressed, and worried about the abundant and rapid roll out of antennas, cell towers, 5G, and wi-fi routers in so many public places and schools.
  • Wildlife & environment: I am also worried for the babies, bats, bees, birds, and big mammals at sea affected by underwater sonar.
  • Exposure limits & testing: I do not feel there is adequate protections, testing, and transparency in the Cell and wireless industry.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077097

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077097

I am very concerned, stressed, and worried about the abundant and rapid roll out of antennas, cell towers, 5G, and wi-fi routers in so many public places and schools. I do not feel there is adequate protections, testing, and transparency in the Cell and wireless industry. I am also worried for the babies, bats, bees, birds, and big mammals at sea affected by underwater sonar. The technology is moving so fast and furious that animals, birds, and humans have become Guinea pigs in a giant experiment of Eco smog, EMF, and EMR microwave radiation. Many people are showing symptoms of Electro Magnetic Hypersensitivity (EMS) and wireless exposure. Companies are well known for producing products with harmful issues and only strict regulations will force them to do the right thing. We need Liability Guidelines & Rules to protect the consumers. Please do the right thing and protect people from high tech advancements that expose animals and people to EMF and EMR. Thank you.