All FCC comments · page 108

2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.

#2141I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Sema Kelly » 2026-09-22

AI summary & topic connections

Cancer & tumors: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
Children, schools & development: The court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: The court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Wildlife & environment: The court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Research, evidence & monitoring: The court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077584

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077584

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency nor is it an expert in medicine, but it continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. This issue matters to me personally because I truly thought I was going to die young as any and all I tried did not work. In fact, the 15 different problems I had just kept getting worse, until I read and read and research, and talked to others until it all pointed to EMF toxicity. Once I took care to "distance and avoid" problems disappeared. No one talks about the dangers of EMF; no one informs the customer buying wireless gadgets it could be harmful. That's why I had to suffer for years until I did my own research and found a way to help myself. Even today, if I'm out in a heavy EMF area or if in a room full of people cell phones, I feel terrible. This is a real problem! I bought an expensive meter to see that it was not "in my head". No, it's a real problem alright. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court. The FCC must act in accordance w/ the federal order. I would like FCC to do their job and do it well and thoroughly. Thank you for this opportunity to express what is a very real and personal problem.

#2142I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Randy Norton » 2026-09-22

Cancer & tumors Children, schools & development Towers, antennas & siting Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Wildlife & environment Exposure limits & testing Court remand & agency accountability Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Towers, antennas & siting: This issue matters to me personally because: After installation of a 5g tower within 1/4 mile of my home, we have experienced strange muscle pains along with GI issues.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077582

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077582

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: After installation of a 5g tower within 1/4 mile of my home, we have experienced strange muscle pains along with GI issues. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2143I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Leah Brown » 2026-09-22

Sensitivity & health experiences Sleep & neurological concerns Cancer & tumors Children, schools & development Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Wildlife & environment Exposure limits & testing Court remand & agency accountability Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: I experience physical symptoms of anxiety without any anxious thoughts when I hold my cellphone for too long.
Sleep & neurological concerns: Two members of our family have neurological problems that got considerably better when we turned the wifi router off.
Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077568

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077568

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: Several members of or household are noticeably affected by wireless technologies. I experience physical symptoms of anxiety without any anxious thoughts when I hold my cellphone for too long. Symptoms include shakiness, externally visible heart palpitations, butterflies in my stomach, and an overwhelming urgency to put the phone down even though I am not done composing or reading an important message or email. I also get hot on my ear or side of head if I make a long call, or that hand gets oddly numb or tingly, or my ear starts ringing. Two members of our family have neurological problems that got considerably better when we turned the wifi router off. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2144I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Elizabeth Turman-Bryant » 2026-09-22

Sensitivity & health experiences Cancer & tumors Children, schools & development Towers, antennas & siting Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Wildlife & environment Exposure limits & testing Court remand & agency accountability Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: This issue matters to me personally because I am electromagnetic sensitive and have a negative reaction to wireless radiation and strong magnetic fields.
Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Towers, antennas & siting: Because wireless and 5G technology is everywhere, it is hard for my body to recover enough to heal.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077546

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077546

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because I am electromagnetic sensitive and have a negative reaction to wireless radiation and strong magnetic fields. Because wireless and 5G technology is everywhere, it is hard for my body to recover enough to heal. I am concerned about my children who are exposed to wireless in their school s. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2145The FCC needs to reconsider the parameters regarding any ‘HARM’ that they are looking at. Previously they…by Margaret Child » 2026-09-22

Children, schools & development Towers, antennas & siting Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Wildlife & environment Exposure limits & testing

AI summary & topic connections

Children, schools & development: As kids we would take great delight in checking as many shoes as we could.
Towers, antennas & siting: I hope it is understood that devices such as microwave ovens, cell towers and cell phones emit certain frequences that cannot be seen, felt or smelled by a regular human being.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I hope it is understood that devices such as microwave ovens, cell towers and cell phones emit certain frequences that cannot be seen, felt or smelled by a regular human being.
Wildlife & environment: Also, the FCC years ago was testing for the effects of the EMFs on plants.
Exposure limits & testing: Also, the FCC years ago was testing for the effects of the EMFs on plants.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077529

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077529

The FCC needs to reconsider the parameters regarding any ‘HARM’ that they are looking at. Previously they have only tested for the transference of ‘HEAT’ – that shows a disturbing lack of understanding of EMFs. I hope it is understood that devices such as microwave ovens, cell towers and cell phones emit certain frequences that cannot be seen, felt or smelled by a regular human being. This does not mean that they don’t exist and/or don’t cause harm! Take the example of X-rays. When I was growing up, when you went to a shoe store, you would expected to find an X-ray machine in every store so that customers could check to see if the shoe was a good fit for the foot. As kids we would take great delight in checking as many shoes as we could. It would take many years before it was discovered that X-rays were actually harmful to the human body! I suspect that the FCC is not taking the similarity between the seemingly harmless EMF frequencies and the dangerous effects of X-rays seriously enough. I was made aware of the effect of EMF’s when I was at a conference a few years ago in a hotel that was right next to a cell tower. One woman complained of feeling unsteady and slightly sick. She couldn’t come up with any reason why she might feel that way. When she moved closer to the center of the hotel the miserable, unsettling feelings would reduce a little. When she went outside she felt like collapsing, almost like her energy was being drained away from her. Since then I have heard of people who have had similar experiences and it has since been revealed that certain people are more sensitive to these EMF frequences than others. Like in the woman at the conference, no one else noticed anything untoward. Also, the FCC years ago was testing for the effects of the EMFs on plants. They promised to go back and do more of those tests, but they never did. I suspect that much could be learned by doing more investigations in that arena.

#2146In 2021 I developed a cardiac arrhythmia (heart palpitation). I was 62 years old. I have been physically …by David R. Shearer » 2026-09-22

Sensitivity & health experiences Sleep & neurological concerns Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Court remand & agency accountability

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: In 2021 I developed a cardiac arrhythmia (heart palpitation).
Sleep & neurological concerns: I found out about symptoms of EMF radiation and an arrhythmia was on the list along with sleep disorders.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I immediately removed 2 cell phones, all cordless phones, wi-fi and turned off the "smart meter", on our property.
Court remand & agency accountability: In 2021 I developed a cardiac arrhythmia (heart palpitation).

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077528

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077528

In 2021 I developed a cardiac arrhythmia (heart palpitation). I was 62 years old. I have been physically active my whole life including 18 years of playing box lacrosse. I found out about symptoms of EMF radiation and an arrhythmia was on the list along with sleep disorders. I immediately removed 2 cell phones, all cordless phones, wi-fi and turned off the "smart meter", on our property. Within one week my heart rhythm had gone back to normal and within about 6 months my sleep returned to a depth where I had forgotten about it. I have been formally trained as an Electronics Technologist (Telecommunications) and an Emergency Medical Technician - Ambulance. The arrhythmia as not returned and I continue to get deep sleep up to this day.

#21471) Walking through the millimeter-wave Airport Scanner caused my vision to change. It took 8 hours for my…by Jeanne Green » 2026-09-22

Towers, antennas & siting Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices

AI summary & topic connections

Towers, antennas & siting: 2) 5-G router siting 5 feet from my desk cause my neck getting hot, and thyroid tissue feeling stressed, after 2 days of sitting at that location.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: 2) 5-G router siting 5 feet from my desk cause my neck getting hot, and thyroid tissue feeling stressed, after 2 days of sitting at that location.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077525

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077525

1) Walking through the millimeter-wave Airport Scanner caused my vision to change. It took 8 hours for my vision to stop being blurry, and start reading again. Later that day -in 2012- I have learned that in UK already had substantial data about damage to cornea of the eye, testicles, and breast tissue. An organization of passengers pushed for removing these scanners from airports. 2) 5-G router siting 5 feet from my desk cause my neck getting hot, and thyroid tissue feeling stressed, after 2 days of sitting at that location. After I moved 20 feet away- no longer a problem. But certainly concerning. Thank you.

#2148Attachment-only filingby Debra Riddick » 2026-09-22

Attachment-only filings

AI summary & topic connections

Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077524

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077524

Official documents · 1

FCC Letter.pdf ↗

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#2149Attachment-only filingby Kelly W Marcotulli » 2026-09-22

Attachment-only filings

AI summary & topic connections

Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077511

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077511

Official documents · 1

My Health and Safety at Risk.pdf ↗

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#2150The FCC should fully consider the effects of its wireless radiation policies on health, although the FCC …by Alexandra Fileccia Busch » 2026-09-22

Sensitivity & health experiences Sleep & neurological concerns Disability, access & daily life Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: For fifteen years I have battled these symptoms from wireless radiation: Sleeplessness; Restless leg syndrome; Shortness of breath; Dizziness; Nausea; Tinnitus; Extreme fatigue; Heart palpitations; Vibrations passing through me as if I were jello; Brain fog and concentration issues; To combat these ailments, and others not listed here, I shield myself 25/7 in some way: I have put up metalic paper in my rented condo where possible.
Sleep & neurological concerns: For fifteen years I have battled these symptoms from wireless radiation: Sleeplessness; Restless leg syndrome; Shortness of breath; Dizziness; Nausea; Tinnitus; Extreme fatigue; Heart palpitations; Vibrations passing through me as if I were jello; Brain fog and concentration issues; To combat these ailments, and others not listed here, I shield myself 25/7 in some way: I have put up metalic paper in my rented condo where possible.
Disability, access & daily life: Let it be known, due to more recent health impact studies, the present-day meters are out of date as to the levels considered "danger zones." To be brief, these issues have impacted my studies, my job choices, and living accommodations and forced relocations.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I do not subscribe to internet in my residence nor do I use an internet phone.
Research, evidence & monitoring: Let it be known, due to more recent health impact studies, the present-day meters are out of date as to the levels considered "danger zones." To be brief, these issues have impacted my studies, my job choices, and living accommodations and forced relocations.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077508

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077508

The FCC should fully consider the effects of its wireless radiation policies on health, although the FCC is not a health agency. Therefore, it must consider the evidence and real world experience of persons in it. For fifteen years I have battled these symptoms from wireless radiation: Sleeplessness; Restless leg syndrome; Shortness of breath; Dizziness; Nausea; Tinnitus; Extreme fatigue; Heart palpitations; Vibrations passing through me as if I were jello; Brain fog and concentration issues; To combat these ailments, and others not listed here, I shield myself 25/7 in some way: I have put up metalic paper in my rented condo where possible. I wear a shielding jumpsuit (it is warm in summer) and a head-covering daily. I sleep between layers of shielding fabric and a sleep cap. I do not subscribe to internet in my residence nor do I use an internet phone. Still, the wifi readings in my place are very high and spike into the red danger zone throughout the day. Let it be known, due to more recent health impact studies, the present-day meters are out of date as to the levels considered "danger zones." To be brief, these issues have impacted my studies, my job choices, and living accommodations and forced relocations. It has disconnected me from family and friends due to incompatible environments. There is no where to hide; at least, none I could afford or would survive, such as an unpopulated island. Alexandra Fileccia-Busch fileccia2011@gmail.com

#2151I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Scott K Cunningham » 2026-09-22

Sensitivity & health experiences Sleep & neurological concerns Cancer & tumors Children, schools & development Towers, antennas & siting Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Wired connections & alternatives Wildlife & environment Exposure limits & testing Court remand & agency accountability Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: This happens in a relatively stereotyped sequence, starting after about 3 hours with activation of my sympathetic autonomic system (ie, "fight or flight" system, due to immediate damage), then progressing to difficulty sleeping that night, sometimes accompanied by a "restless legs" feeling (which I otherwise never have) and then fairly profound fatigue for the next 2 to 3 days, until my system recovers, utilizing passage of time in the relatively "safer" environment of my home, along with several biological strategies required for recovery.
Sleep & neurological concerns: This happens in a relatively stereotyped sequence, starting after about 3 hours with activation of my sympathetic autonomic system (ie, "fight or flight" system, due to immediate damage), then progressing to difficulty sleeping that night, sometimes accompanied by a "restless legs" feeling (which I otherwise never have) and then fairly profound fatigue for the next 2 to 3 days, until my system recovers, utilizing passage of time in the relatively "safer" environment of my home, along with several biological strategies required for recovery.
Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Towers, antennas & siting: I also suffer from chronic illness myself, and as such have found myself extraordinarily sensitive to the presence of the microwave carrier frequencies used ubiquitously by the telecom industry (cell towers and cell phones), home and office connective infrastructure (WiFi routers, computers using WiFi, office equipment continuously emitting wireless radiation, even the newer automobiles that continuously emit wireless radiation.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Wired connections & alternatives: I also keep my cell phone on airplane mode except to text, essentially never using my cell phone for calls.
Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077476 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077476 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: I am a practicing Internal Medicine physician with additional expertise in Integrative Medicine, which uses biologic strategies to reverse chronic illnesses. I also suffer from chronic illness myself, and as such have found myself extraordinarily sensitive to the presence of the microwave carrier frequencies used ubiquitously by the telecom industry (cell towers and cell phones), home and office connective infrastructure (WiFi routers, computers using WiFi, office equipment continuously emitting wireless radiation, even the newer automobiles that continuously emit wireless radiation. I have extensively…

Read the full comment →

#2152Attachment-only filingby Roxanne Stone » 2026-09-21

Attachment-only filings

AI summary & topic connections

Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077445

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077445

Official documents · 1

FCC_comments about RF.pdf ↗

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#2153I came down with EMRS in 2012. Since then, I have been electrosensitive making it difficult to go anywher…by Beatrice Caspari » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Towers, antennas & siting Court remand & agency accountability

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: Since then, I have been electrosensitive making it difficult to go anywhere since the levels of RF radiation almost everywhere are too high for sensitive individuals, and unhealthy for all since the FCC limits are outdated and unsafe.
Towers, antennas & siting: Thankfully, I have the resources to have bought a home is an area that is currently safe, with no cell towers in my vicinity.
Court remand & agency accountability: My greatest fear is that this safety could easily be threatened by the telecom industry putting a cell tower or small cell up near my home.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077444

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077444

I came down with EMRS in 2012. Since then, I have been electrosensitive making it difficult to go anywhere since the levels of RF radiation almost everywhere are too high for sensitive individuals, and unhealthy for all since the FCC limits are outdated and unsafe. My health has suffered including nerve and thyroid damage. Thankfully, I have the resources to have bought a home is an area that is currently safe, with no cell towers in my vicinity. My greatest fear is that this safety could easily be threatened by the telecom industry putting a cell tower or small cell up near my home. I would have little or no recourse to do anything about it with the current FCC rules.

#2154Attachment-only filingby Rose Knight » 2026-09-21

Attachment-only filings

AI summary & topic connections

Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077432

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077432

Official documents · 1

2026.09.21 FCC 13-84 Knight Rose statement.pdf ↗

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#2155I am very concerned about radio frequency and its impacts on humans, especially children. I am writing re…by Martha Jane Shoultz » 2026-09-21

Children, schools & development Exposure limits & testing Court remand & agency accountability Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Children, schools & development: I am very concerned about radio frequency and its impacts on humans, especially children.
Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Research, evidence & monitoring: This issue matters to me personally because my 2 children have chronic illness, and doctors are not sure whether long-term exposure to RF radiation is a cause of their illness.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077425

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077425

I am very concerned about radio frequency and its impacts on humans, especially children. I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. Since the FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health, I'm not sure why the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because my 2 children have chronic illness, and doctors are not sure whether long-term exposure to RF radiation is a cause of their illness. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

#2156Attachment-only filingby Adair Seldon » 2026-09-21

Attachment-only filings

AI summary & topic connections

Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077424

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077424

Official documents · 1

RF Exposure Experience.pdf ↗

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#2157There is a cell tower a mile from me and in 2022 At&t put in new WIFI. Since then I got a melanoma on my …by Debra Munoz » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Biological mechanisms & metabolism Towers, antennas & siting Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Wildlife & environment

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: I am usually very energetic, lost it and suffer bad fatigue, acquired lots of popping in tendons, intense sneezing and congestion.
Biological mechanisms & metabolism: My little cat was diagnosed with diabetes in Jan 2023.
Towers, antennas & siting: There is a cell tower a mile from me and in 2022 At&t put in new WIFI.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: There is a cell tower a mile from me and in 2022 At&t put in new WIFI.
Wildlife & environment: I noticed 2 elm trees right outside started just drying up.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077418

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077418

There is a cell tower a mile from me and in 2022 At&t put in new WIFI. Since then I got a melanoma on my face. . I am usually very energetic, lost it and suffer bad fatigue, acquired lots of popping in tendons, intense sneezing and congestion. Pain all over my body that I struggle to get to work. My little cat was diagnosed with diabetes in Jan 2023. He has none of the normal markers to have gotten it. His appetite slowed to a snails pace where before he was a food hound. I noticed 2 elm trees right outside started just drying up. Had to fertilize this year to bring them back. I have been in this house 23 yrs. and the last 4 have been hell, I just don't feel like myself . I even put WIFI protection stickers on my computer and tablets. This on top of all the sky spraying chemtrails, Life is becoming unbearable anymore.

#2158Attachment-only filingby Jennifer Swayne » 2026-09-21

Attachment-only filings

AI summary & topic connections

Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077415

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077415

Official documents · 1

EMR filing with FCC.pdf ↗

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#2159To whom it may concern. I am highly affected by non native EMFs and would be thrilled if there were actio…by Rebekah » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Sleep & neurological concerns Children, schools & development Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: If there is Bluetooth or Wi-Fi around me, I suffer with massive headaches.
Sleep & neurological concerns: I am unable to sleep if there is any Wi-Fi in im my home.
Children, schools & development: I just can’t imagine anyone using these toxins around children.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I am unable to sleep if there is any Wi-Fi in im my home.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077413

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077413

To whom it may concern. I am highly affected by non native EMFs and would be thrilled if there were actions taken to mitigate the dangers of them. I am unable to sleep if there is any Wi-Fi in im my home. If there is Bluetooth or Wi-Fi around me, I suffer with massive headaches. I am unable to ride in a Tesla or any car that uses Bluetooth due to severe migraines. Often times my heart will begin to hurt. As someone who works in agriculture i have seen the effects of these toxins on my animals and their production as well as the produce production amd quality. I just can’t imagine anyone using these toxins around children. It causes severe behavior issues and harms the cells of any individual. Please consider actions to help with this.

#2160I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by E.R. Higgins » 2026-09-21

Sensitivity & health experiences Sleep & neurological concerns Cancer & tumors Children, schools & development Biological mechanisms & metabolism Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices Wildlife & environment Exposure limits & testing Court remand & agency accountability Research, evidence & monitoring

AI summary & topic connections

Sensitivity & health experiences: Other effects that are reported include headaches and memory loss.
Sleep & neurological concerns: Other effects that are reported include headaches and memory loss.
Cancer & tumors: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
Children, schools & development: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
Biological mechanisms & metabolism: Non-thermal effects of radio frequencies lead to concerns such as cellular stress and DNA damage.
Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: This issue matters to me personally because of the increase in the usage of cell phones, microwaves, and other developing technology.
Wildlife & environment: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
Research, evidence & monitoring: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077407

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077407

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. This issue matters to me personally because of the increase in the usage of cell phones, microwaves, and other developing technology. Non-thermal effects of radio frequencies lead to concerns such as cellular stress and DNA damage. Some studies suggest exposure to RF radiation could potentially affect the blood-brain barrier. This barrier is crucial for protecting the brain from harmful substances. Other effects that are reported include headaches and memory loss. Outdated guidelines need revamping. I am all for the FCC looking at the damage radio frequencies can do to humans, flora and fauna, using the up-to-date amounts of radiation exposure taken in by the most ardent users of radio frequency technology!