Greetings FCC, I have experienced loss of equilibrium due to electromagnetic frequency bombardment and sl…

FCC public comment #26110077225 · ET Docket 13-84 · 2026-09-21

#1Greetings FCC, I have experienced loss of equilibrium due to electromagnetic frequency bombardment and sl…by John Oswald » 2026-09-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • E-Rate & school connectivity: The 2.4 GHz frequency band is a globally recognized, unlicensed spectrum range (2.400–2.4835 GHz) within the Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) band, allowing devices to operate without regulatory licensing.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: Greetings FCC, I have experienced loss of equilibrium due to electromagnetic frequency bombardment and sleep interruption from the dangerous standard frequency of 2.4 GHz.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: It serves as the foundational infrastructure for ubiquitous short-range wireless technologies, most notably Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11b/g/n/ax), Bluetooth, Zigbee, and cordless phones.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: The 2.4 GHz frequency band is a globally recognized, unlicensed spectrum range (2.400–2.4835 GHz) within the Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) band, allowing devices to operate without regulatory licensing.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110077225

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077225

Greetings FCC, I have experienced loss of equilibrium due to electromagnetic frequency bombardment and sleep interruption from the dangerous standard frequency of 2.4 GHz. The 2.4 GHz frequency band is a globally recognized, unlicensed spectrum range (2.400–2.4835 GHz) within the Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) band, allowing devices to operate without regulatory licensing. It serves as the foundational infrastructure for ubiquitous short-range wireless technologies, most notably Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11b/g/n/ax), Bluetooth, Zigbee, and cordless phones. This is a harmful frequency implemented rather than a beneficial frequency for an unknown, but likely nefarious, purpose.

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official FCC filing.

Replies