The FCC has had the five years following its CHD/EHT District Court mandate to cull through the hundreds …

FCC public comment #26110082834 · ET Docket 13-84 · 2026-10-21

#1The FCC has had the five years following its CHD/EHT District Court mandate to cull through the hundreds …by Mark Wahl » 2026-10-21
AI summary & topic connections
  • Court remand & agency accountability: The FCC has had the five years following its CHD/EHT District Court mandate to cull through the hundreds of pages documenting thousands of international expert studies of RF effects (as well as 200 documented testimonies from RF-harmed individuals).
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: The FCC has had the five years following its CHD/EHT District Court mandate to cull through the hundreds of pages documenting thousands of international expert studies of RF effects (as well as 200 documented testimonies from RF-harmed individuals).

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082834

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082834

The FCC has had the five years following its CHD/EHT District Court mandate to cull through the hundreds of pages documenting thousands of international expert studies of RF effects (as well as 200 documented testimonies from RF-harmed individuals). The FCC complaint to the same high court’s recent mandamus for a response was that it hadn’t had time. So, it apparently spent zero time on this task thus far, a thumb to its nose at the force of law. Now, as its passive desire to demonstrate effort on the grievously neglected court mandate, it asks the public to once again send it evidence from all those studies it certainly still possesses references for in the court documents. Environmental Health Trust, in the interim after the winning 2022 lawsuit, conveyed to the FCC another copious list of references showing further confirmation of many harms from RF radiation that is below the antiquated elevated strength limits of the FCC. All this new “request for information” is a non-convincing pinky promise that it will do something with this information, but what exactly is it?

Share this public comment

Share guide: link to the comment page, quote the commenter's own words, and point people to the official docket to file their own comment.

Discuss this comment

Replies are reviewed before they appear. This is a community discussion, not an official FCC filing.

Replies